But seriously, did O.J. do it?

OJ did it?


  • Total voters
    453

Fanservice

Bih call me senpai
Joined
Mar 16, 2014
Messages
7,430
Reputation
1,864
Daps
49,719
On one hand, I don’t think the juice killed anyone directly. :patrice:

On the other hand, I don’t understand why oldheads go so hard for a c00n who said he wasn’t black :ld:
 

Ol’Otis

The Picasso of the Ghetto
Joined
Aug 30, 2015
Messages
64,384
Reputation
19,521
Daps
263,824
Reppin
South Central Los Angeles
nikka he wrote a book and told us already :gucci:

220px-If_I_did_It_2.png
Arnelle admitted that someone ghost wrote this
 

mag357

Superstar
Joined
Jan 4, 2017
Messages
18,580
Reputation
35
Daps
57,290
On one hand, I don’t think the juice killed anyone directly. :patrice:

On the other hand, I don’t understand why oldheads go so hard for a c00n who said he wasn’t black :ld:

That's was the last era when black people would ride for other blacks, no matter what.

Include the Kobe situation in there too
 
Last edited:

3rdWorld

Veteran
Joined
Mar 24, 2014
Messages
43,637
Reputation
3,646
Daps
127,818
No doubt OJ was such a top c00n..he'd make a Clarence Thomas blush.

But..I strongly and sincerely maintain he didn't kill those cacs.
 

Raizan

Pro
Joined
Aug 13, 2012
Messages
565
Reputation
200
Daps
1,989
He did it. Years ago I got to attend this seminar with some of the folks the prepared the blood evidence for the prosecution. OJ said that he was never there, but the prosecution presented that one sample that placed him at the scene. It should be noted that other folks have been successfully convicted on far less evidence than was used against Simpson...

Anyway, that one sample is what people need to focus on. It has a one in a billion chance of being wrong. The prosecution presented that ONE sample because that alone should have been enough to convict Simpson. But the real truth is that they found his blood in more than SIXTY different spots.
 

3rdWorld

Veteran
Joined
Mar 24, 2014
Messages
43,637
Reputation
3,646
Daps
127,818
He did it. Years ago I got to attend this seminar with some of the folks the prepared the blood evidence for the prosecution. OJ said that he was never there, but the prosecution presented that one sample that placed him at the scene. It should be noted that other folks have been successfully convicted on far less evidence than was used against Simpson...

Anyway, that one sample is what people need to focus on. It has a one in a billion chance of being wrong. The prosecution presented that ONE sample because that alone should have been enough to convict Simpson. But the real truth is that they found his blood in more than SIXTY different spots.

Sample of fukking what, and how long was it there for??? :comeon:

Or you mean the evidence that nazi Furhman was caught planting :mjpls:
 
Top