This is the sort of comment section that will separate the fake militants just here for the racial shyt from the true woman-haters who are all in.
You're literally inventing backstories to how it happened, denying facts about the case that you have no knowledge of, and basically saying that not getting away with it was as big or bigger an issue than doing it in the first place.
Oh, and:
Ex-NFL punter Matt Araiza and the woman who accused him of rape talk to USA TODAY Sports, shed new light on pending civil case.
www.usatoday.com
SAN DIEGO – In an effort to clear his name and get a job, former NFL punter Matt Araiza has sent NFL teams a piece of evidence that reveals several startling facts about what happened the night he was accused of raping a 17-year-old girl in San Diego.
It’s an audio recording of a meeting Dec. 7, when a San Diego County prosecutor met with the woman and her attorney. It’s 101 minutes long and was not released to the public.
But USA TODAY Sports obtained it recently, then interviewed Araiza and the woman separately to break it down in detail. In the recording, the prosecutor gives a point-by-point explanation of why her office never charged Araiza and others with any crimes after they were accused of brutally gang-raping the woman at a house party near San Diego State in October 2021
In an interview with USA TODAY Sports, the woman emphasized that she was intoxicated to the point of not being able to consent to sex and that the video clips show only a fraction of what happened that night. She said the videos add up to around 30 seconds out of a sequence that lasted more than 90 minutes.
“I just don’t think that’s fair at all to look at these short clips that were already way into this assault already happening and make a judgment on that and say that that was consensual,” she said.
What was the woman’s reaction to the decision?
She cried when Deputy District Attorney Trisha Amador told her no criminal charges would be filed. Then the meeting resumed and Amador discussed the evidence, which included four terabytes of data, more than 35 taped witness interviews, a physical exam of the woman and nine video clips that were made that night of the woman’s sexual encounters
Her lawsuit states that her nose, belly button and ear piercings had been pulled out and that she was also bleeding from her vagina.
But Amador initially said the sex video clips show her piercings “are all still in.”
“So I don't know who or how or when those would have been removed, but during the videos, all of your piercings are still in,” Amador said.
Amador later acknowledged on the recording she couldn’t see the woman’s belly in the video to determine if the piercing was ripped out.
“That's the worst one,” the woman replied. “It was completely ripped through.· I still have like a hole in it. It completely ripped through.”
At a minimum, it paints a different picture of what happened compared to the shocking allegations that came out against Araiza and two other former San Diego State football players last year in a pending civil lawsuit filed by the woman’s attorney. The recording references nine brief video clips of the woman’s sexual encounters that night, none of which showed Araiza, who has denied wrongdoing and says the recording is “huge.” His attorney said he declined an offer from the woman’s attorney to settle the case for $50,000.
“I know the teams know the true facts,” Araiza told USA TODAY Sports. “They’ve heard the audio. They know this isn’t true. It’s that we need the public to understand as well. Because I think teams have a fear that if they sign me, there will be a little bit of backlash because the public has been told things that aren’t true.”
The woman, now 18, has a different view of the recording.