Whatever. The two literally mean the same thing.ALL atheists are non-theists, but not all non-theists are atheists.

Whatever. The two literally mean the same thing.ALL atheists are non-theists, but not all non-theists are atheists.
are you sure? or is this a blanket all non believers will perish in enternity in hell reasoning?Whatever. The two literally mean the same thing.![]()
Fervid said:Whatever. The two literally mean the same thing.![]()
That's because it only makes sense to you. That should tell you something.And that's why I have to clarify my theological position.
People still don't get it even though I've explained it numerous times.
It's like this board is FULL of people with ADD/ADHD.
Fervid said:That's because it only makes sense to you. That should tell you something.
Chris B. is one of them. Can't remember the other one. I unsubscribed the thread after neither of them would read the evidence which refuted their opinion.
If they go through with plans for taxing churches, the next dominant religious group will undoubtedly be judeo-christian.
Instead of thousands of individual churches, there'll be a few gigantic ones with millions of members.
Then again, maybe not. With the birth-rate of Muslims as a factor, we may all be worshipping Allah.
Either way, I'll be long dead before that happens.......I hope......
tru_m.a.c said:yeah I didn't mean dominant through the number of churches, but through electoral advantage
Sensitive Blake Griffin said:is this stupid shyt?
So you support secular institutions propounding anti-scientific garbage and spreading ignorance and stupidity like creationism and proto-fascist declarations of faith?
Let angry white nationalists who read too much Lord of the Rings and Ayn Rand post on your board, brehs.