Because I saw that sneak diss dap.
Dap for not making excuses and propagandizing why you lost. Because that's exactly what happened - both teams were dealing with injuries and neither team were at a deficit through ailments that took them out of the contest.Said we lost that one in a classic playoff game probably best round 1 series of all time that I can recall
As far as injuries goes it was on both sides
Blake quad if memory serves me correct he still wasn't over
Paul hammy that he got in game 7
Parker hamstrings and ankle he never got over
Splitter back he never got over
It is what it is we lost simple as that
What the fukk are you even talking about? What the fukk does that have to do with what I said? Let me remind you on how this started:
I responded with -
Here the cornball @duckbutta is on his usual Spurs agitprop bullshyt; detailing injuries that the Spurs were dealing with as reason for why they lost, failing to acknowledge that the Clippers were dealing with injuries to their two best players - one of whom (CP3) was playing on one leg in G7. He can't use the excuse of injuries in this context, because the Clippers were dealing with injuries of their own - which arguably were more serious than those the Spurs had to deal with.
@Freddie.Cane @malbaker86 @twan83 @AlbertPullhoez can get some of this too.
That does NOT make him a top 5 offensive player. I don't know how you're parameterizing offensive impact/skillsets, but I can assure you it's not done in that manner. Especially considering that this is Kawhi's first season where he's putting up those type of scoring #s. Players like Curry, Harden, Westbrook, LeBron, AD, Boogie etc etc have done it for longer and on higher volume. And that's before we get into players like Curry, Westbrook, LeBron, CP3, Lowry etc etc who can actually run an elite offense.
Draymond has been the best defender for two years running, but that's neither here nor there. He won the Finals MVP because he limited the best player in the world while putting up mid-level offensive #s, not because he had an all-time great Finals performance. I don't know why you're using his Finals MVP/ring as if it has any relevance to this discussion, he was never a dominant player at that time.
In no specific order:
What the fukk are you even talking about? What the fukk does that have to do with what I said? Let me remind you on how this started:
I responded with -
Here the cornball @duckbutta is on his usual Spurs agitprop bullshyt; detailing injuries that the Spurs were dealing with as reason for why they lost, failing to acknowledge that the Clippers were dealing with injuries to their two best players - one of whom (CP3) was playing on one leg in G7. He can't use the excuse of injuries in this context, because the Clippers were dealing with injuries of their own - which arguably were more serious than those the Spurs had to deal with.
@Freddie.Cane @malbaker86 @twan83 @AlbertPullhoez can get some of this too.
what up gil
Young GOAT with the haters :spurs:
That's how you know it's real
You said his resume not good enough for him to be top 3 but when i mention what he's done you say your not sure why I'm bringing his accomplishments up
You can keep him out your top 5 if you want to,but he's in mine fasho
