Bret Hart says Triple H Never Had A Great Match

StatUS

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
28,495
Reputation
1,884
Daps
62,608
Reppin
Everywhere
HHH Has always been my least fav member of DX and i try to forget he's part of the kliq. :russ: I wasnt watching wrestling during Evolution era so :manny: I only tolerated him during the "1, 2...this on?" theme era cause that theme was piff but overall he's Bland as fukk, I dont love him or hate him but thats the complete opposite of what a wrestler is supposed to do. He does nothing memorable.

Admit it #Kliq he's only tolerated because of his affiliations but whatever hope he succeeds with the talent.
You must like the sounds of Geese getting strangled on a loop.
 
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
5,686
Reputation
1,866
Daps
19,616
Man I feel sorry for Bret.....growing up I never liked the guy (TeamHBK) but I respected his techniques

That Montreal Screwjob is like burning anger and resentment eating away at him for almost twenty years. I don't care how many DVDs him and Shawn do for Bret that night will never go away.
 

Bob Loblaw

Superstar
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
11,837
Reputation
1,194
Daps
27,850
:ooh: Tyson Kidd bout to get them deavors while he's on the disabled list if Bret Don't calm down. lol at bret throwing all this shade at hunter out of nowhere. They gonna book AJ beat Nattie in 15 seconds with The Sharpshooter next they go to Canada. :lolbron:

That'd be a step up bruh:pachaha:
 

Henzo

Kliq'd Up
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
7,263
Reputation
771
Daps
11,594
From Wrestlezone http://www.wrestlezone.com/editoria...sthe-problem-not-the-solutionfive-ring-circus

Mark Madden said:
Bret Hart’s blistering critique of Triple H is ironic considering Triple H is exactly the same as Hart: A B-plus wrestler.

By way of definition:

The IWC and so-called wrestling “journalists” far overrate most performers. In reality, Grade A wrestlers are few and far between. I define a Grade A wrestler as one who is superior in every way: Ring work, promos, look, persona, drawing power, track record, reliability, employability. There’s also an intangible feeling that accompanies, a larger-than-life vibe.

Using such criteria, the past 20 years have produced just four Grade A wrestlers: Steve Austin, Shawn Michaels, The Rock and Undertaker.

Everybody else, at best, is a B-plus wrestler. A B-plus wrestler is real good, almost great, but comes up short in some small way.

Circumstance dictates, too. It’s impossible to be a Grade A wrestler in Impact. Impact is the promotion that falls in the forest. That’s why Kurt Angle, despite an incredible performance level, can’t be Grade A.

C.M. Punk’s look is the chink is his armor. John Cena’s lack of love from certain male demographics does him in. Hart and Triple H fall short on intangibles: They’re just not quite there with the “big four.” Hart’s stint in WCW diminished him. Triple H hasn’t had enough memorable matches.

I’m a Bret Hart fan. But his posture as judge, jury and hangman when it comes to rating wrestlers (with him setting the bar) is more than just a bit precious. If the WWE steroid scandal hadn’t (quite literally) downsized the promotion, Bret would have spent his career as a tag-team specialist.

That said, Bret got his shot and succeeded. Well done. But to put Bret in a class with the aforementioned “big four” is inaccurate. To put him in a class with Grade A wrestlers from previous eras (like Ric Flair) is inaccurate.

Bret Hart is a B-plus wrestler. Just like Triple H. It’s not an insult.

:takedat:
 
Top