Brehs who deny human Evolution, what's so bad about us being descendants of apes?

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,063
Reputation
8,154
Daps
122,281
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Fukk u cac

Doesn't apply to me.

You, on the other hand.......

Demographics

nones-demog-4.png


:sas2:
 

xCivicx

Veteran
Joined
Dec 29, 2016
Messages
24,576
Reputation
2,745
Daps
78,941
Reppin
Atl
It’s sad some black folks equate the theory of evolution with cacs like they’re not any black evolutionary biologist’s :mjpls: but believe a book wrote by ignorant goat fukkers thousands of years ago :snoop: most of us are talking to each other spread throughout the earth In real time, on a fukking supercomputer that fits in our pocket but some have the nerve to shyt on science:why:
Whats sad is that you choose to cling so tightly to an extremely racist THEORY that you never took the time to sit down and understand the history of

Prove that you "evolved" from an ape in this thread

I'll wait
 

xCivicx

Veteran
Joined
Dec 29, 2016
Messages
24,576
Reputation
2,745
Daps
78,941
Reppin
Atl
In biology, evolution is the change in the characteristics of a species over several generations and relies on the process of natural selection.
CHANGING characteristics and ADDING characteristics are 2 completely different things
 

xCivicx

Veteran
Joined
Dec 29, 2016
Messages
24,576
Reputation
2,745
Daps
78,941
Reppin
Atl
Should be noted that we are apes, not descendant of apes, we simply share a common ancestor with other apes on this planet from which we branched off from. I only say that because people are going to wonder why there are still apes if we descended from them. But it becomes clear we share a common ancestor by simply looking at constructions of early humans based on fossils.

Also, educated Christians are distancing themselves from young-earth creationists, even distancing themselves from literal creationism, tracing it back to St. Augustine's interpretation of genesis, and on the simple basis that those working in related fields of science suggest it becoming increasingly difficult to deny evolution. So you can search "Sy Garte", a Christian with a PhD in biochemstry, he used to debate Christians all the time on evolution because it drove him crazy watching them denying evolution, "old earth", and even dinosaurs in debates. Guy was heavy in debate rooms when the topic came up.
While at the same time scientists are becoming more agnostic as time goes on

Interesting
 

xCivicx

Veteran
Joined
Dec 29, 2016
Messages
24,576
Reputation
2,745
Daps
78,941
Reppin
Atl
Unless you're out here worshipping Osun and Shango or something, you don't have a leg to stand on in this regard.
Nah

You just dont know the actual history of evolutionary theory

Pretty disappointing considering you have the entire internet at your fingertips

Ill ask you the same question though:

Why do you believe that the African is genetically inferior to the European? Thats literally the only "proof" of evolutionary theory. You would know this if gaining knowledge(as opposed to pushing a racist narrative) was your actual goal
 

xCivicx

Veteran
Joined
Dec 29, 2016
Messages
24,576
Reputation
2,745
Daps
78,941
Reppin
Atl
This is not pokemon. Being evolved from something does not make you better. There are many good and bad evolutionary traits and "good" and "bad" are relative to whatever environment you are in. Sickle cell is one example. The problem is you only know evolution through pokemon and racist cacs so you think there is some sort of hierarchy when its just a process of change.

Learn biology
Your problem is that you DONT know what evolutionary theory means and youre in here posting what you HOPE evolution means

Racist europea a created the entire concept so actually NOBODY knows what evolutionary theory means outside that context, because it is the ONLY CONTEXT

This what comes up when you Google "whats the best example of evolutionary theory?"
that does the selecting.

Put simply, the theory of evolution by means of natural selection can be described as "descent with modification," said Briana Pobiner, an anthropologist and educator at the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History in Washington, D.C., who specializes in the study of human origins. The theory is sometimes described as "survival of the fittest," but that characterization can be misleading, Pobiner said. Here, "fitness" refers not to an organism's strength or athleticism but rather its ability to survive and reproduce.

Natural selection can alter a species in small ways, causing a population to change color or size over the course of several generations, according to The Natural History Museum. When this process happens over a relatively short period of time and in a species or small group of organisms, scientists call it "microevolution."





Archaeopteryx, shown here in this illustration, is considered the first bird-like dinosaur on record, dating to about 150 million years ago during the Jurassic period. (Image credit: Leonello Calvetti/Getty Images)

But when given enough time and accumulated changes, natural selection can create entirely new species, a process known as "macroevolution," according to Derek Turner and Joyce C. havstad in "The Philosophy of Macroevolution." This long-term process is what turned dinosaurs into birds, amphibious mammals (such as an animal called Indohyus) into whales and a common ancestor of apes and humans into the people, chimps and gorillas we know today.

Darwin also described a form of natural selection that depends on an organism's success at attracting a mate — a process known as sexual selection, according to Nature Education. The colorful plumage of peacocks and the antlers of male deer are both examples of traits that evolved under this type of selection.

HOW DID WHALES EVOLVE?
One of the best examples scientists have of natural selection, is the evolution of whales. By using Darwin's theory as a guide, and understanding how natural selection works, biologists determined that the transition of early whales from land to water occurred in a series of predictable steps.

The evolution of the blowhole, for example, might have started with random genetic changes that resulted in at least one whale having its nostrils farther back on its head, according to Phys.org.

The whales with this adaptation would have been better suited to a marine lifestyle, since they would not have had to completely surface to breathe. Such individuals were more successful and had more offspring. In later generations, more genetic changes occurred, moving the nose farther back on the head.

Other body parts of early whales also changed. Front legs became flippers. Back legs disappeared. Their bodies became more streamlined, and they developed tail flukes to better propel themselves through water, according to the Natural History Museum.

Even though scientists could predict what early whales should look like, for a long time they lacked the fossil evidence to back up their claim.

They wrote all that nonsense just to say that theyre guessing and cannot prove what theyre saying

THIS is the nonsense that youre clinging to for dear life smfh

Show me the bones of a half-whale witg legs

Post a pic in here. Ill wait
 

skylove4

Veteran
Joined
Nov 20, 2013
Messages
18,579
Reputation
4,900
Daps
89,737
Whats sad is that you choose to cling so tightly to an extremely racist THEORY that you never took the time to sit down and understand the history of

Prove that you "evolved" from an ape in this thread

I'll wait
It’s been explained multiple times in this thread we didn’t evolve from modern day apes or monkeys, but we instead share a common ancestor with them:snoop:
 

tuckgod

The high exalted
Bushed
Joined
Feb 4, 2016
Messages
48,571
Reputation
14,760
Daps
180,794
Also, white people say that they "evolved" from the African, which would make the African "genetically inferior" to the european. This is a fundamental tenet of evolution

Exactly.

Most people never bother to look at the entire title of Darwin’s book.

makwbtislt161.jpg
 

xCivicx

Veteran
Joined
Dec 29, 2016
Messages
24,576
Reputation
2,745
Daps
78,941
Reppin
Atl
It’s been explained multiple times in this thread we didn’t evolve from modern day apes or monkeys, but we instead share a common ancestor with them:snoop:
Link the bones of the common ancestor

Then explain how the european shares ~4% of its dna with primates while the African shares 0% of his dna with primates
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,063
Reputation
8,154
Daps
122,281
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
It’s been explained multiple times in this thread we didn’t evolve from modern day apes or monkeys, but we instead share a common ancestor with them:snoop:

You're arguing with someone who believes the Earth is flat.​

Science and basic math are beyond him.​
 
Top