Its not illogical its just you disagree so of course you would make it seem bad. Of course you don't have the same qualities at the same exact level. Nobody said you had to. I'm pretty sure I said if you can tell that clearly without measuring something its pretty obvious dude into sucker behavior but like somebody else maybe dude just about that super calm life. That to me usually is the life of suckers because that stuff extends in almost everything they do. I'm calm too to a point but the things he allows you to do wouldn't work for a lot of dudes I run I to that's all.
You can throw your little insults and call me a fool doesn't change anything and being a sucker isn't cool and I never criticized dude for loving you and said if it works for y'all cool in the first reply back so stop the bullshyt for sympathy. At least keep it real son no need to do like a 5yr old and add extras on top of whats been said.
The fact remains it reflects bad on both of you period. You for being that way and him and the others before him allowing it. You must been dating suckers for a hot minute. Most guys hell people only going to be with somebody on that vibe towards them but only so long unless they are desperate for companionship or suckers sorry. Nobody wants people tripping on them hell even you yourself said if somebody did it towards you you'd react differently but I'm wrong? Ok. He should have walked away not did you no harm cause most times when people go unchecked and or they get a certain age they aren't changing. That's my point but apparently dude wants to be a puppy dog since his last girl was liking him and he didn't like it. Being the submissive one seems to fit him better but like I said originally I don't agree with dudes ways of doing business but if it works for y'all great.
Yes it is very illogical to conclude that because life happens, that it automatically means that I constantly trip out on him and this is some sort of hostile situation. It is very illogical to conclude that there is any sort of negative vibe between us, especially when I have done nothing but show how much I respect him in these posts.
A sucker is a man who allows himself to be disrespected, taken advantage of, cheated on, and worked like a whipping boy. That does not describe the situation we are discussing in this thread. Therefore your entire premise is illogical.
He would be a sucker to treat me the way he does if my entire attitude towards him was negative, nasty, disrespectful, and unaccommodating. But that is not the case. However I am honest enough to admit that certain things would not work in reverse, it just wouldn't. And I am not simply referring to manner of speech or how arguments are handled. And that is okay for there to be that slight difference. There is nothing wrong with that.
The adage we are discussing in this thread remains around for a reason. I am not the first to support the notion that the man needs to have a little more love than the woman, and I won't be the last to support it. My style of describing it may not be the most pleasant, but sometimes you have to get down to facts without trying to be cute.
I talk a lot about what I do for my husband, but it would be irresponsible to promote that type of behavior without discussing how he treats me in return.
A lot of men want a woman who will give him 3 homemade meals a day, do most of the housework, educate the kids, run the business, help with his errands, boost his ego, do this and do all that, but then in return she is supposed to be happy just to be married.
Nope. If I can talk about why it's important to cook, be encouraging, make your man feel important, etc- then I will also talk about the other side which is that I do that because he has proven he deserves it. Women are out here giving out too much for little in return.