Field Marshall Bradley
Veteran
So you don’t know what tongue in cheek actually means….. ?
Breaking: Services can be denied to Gays (Supreme Court ruling)
- Thread starter levitate
- Start date
So you don’t know what tongue in cheek actually means….. ?
How did the abortion thing backfire?
I'm not looking for a coli argument I'm really asking because I have no idea
GOP struggled in the midterms
levitate
I love you, you know.
Republicans underperformed during the midterm elections.
I'm not about to be arguing with y'all this morning SARCASM
BmoreGorilla
Veteran
Sir Richard Spirit
Superstar
I’m convinced 99% of people don’t even know what’s going on. Only the headlines.
levitate
I love you, you know.
Right they’re like “fukk y’all, we’re off to our yachts!”HAPPY JULY 4 Americans
BmoreGorilla
Veteran
Look at how it affected the mid term elections. Then you look at more and more young folks identifying as gay or transgender or no gender at all. Alot of those people are gonna be pushed to vote Democrat if they don’t already
Trumps presidency set this country back so far because he got these Supreme Court picks. He doesn’t even have to win another election, the consequences of his presidency will be felt for decades to come
they keep using language like "private business"
but these businesses are anything but private, they are operating in the public space and should be forced to render their services to the public or be shut down
saying that you dont agree with someones way of life was never restricted to these people: they could vocally say what they wanted
saying that they were not able to say what they want is a lie. This ruling stinks and the courts should be ashamed for the precedent they are setting
but these businesses are anything but private, they are operating in the public space and should be forced to render their services to the public or be shut down
saying that you dont agree with someones way of life was never restricted to these people: they could vocally say what they wanted
saying that they were not able to say what they want is a lie. This ruling stinks and the courts should be ashamed for the precedent they are setting
the issue with this is that just because someone disagrees with someones lifestyle doesnt mean their public facing business should have the right to discriminate
by rule: corporations and businesses are treated as individuals under law. So what they are saying is that the business as an individual has the right to discriminate on religious grounds which is ridiculous as you can use "religious" grounds to discriminate on just about anything your heart desires.
Serving a person food and hosting an event that promotes a lifestyle that against your faith is different.
