That's a false equivalency, breh. When's the last time any Horner been held back for their hairline? Meanwhile those features (wide nose, kinky hair) were used to oppress them.
This argument only makes sense if you're arguing with a cac.
We're talking about so called black folks shytting on certain features that are unique to another group of so called black folks, which
they claim are within the range of what constitutes "black phenotypes". How is that not = c00n shyt, but using words like Jareer (literally "kinky hair") is?
I'm just trying to make sense of this breh
The only way this would make sense is if you don't really view people from that part of the world as black, which is fine by me, at least that would be a more honest position
Also, watch a breh make fun of impoverished Ugandans and see if he doesn't get crucified by the coli militants, but nikkas like
@Dip can use white supremacist rhetoric about impoverished Somalis and it's all good. Not only that, but if a Somali responds in kind, then he is the one who is declared a c00n
Like I said, these double standards are not lost on anyone with an ounce of common sense.