BREAKING: Free agent F Paul George has agreed on a four-year, $212 million maximum contract with the Philadelphia 76ers

duckbutta

eienaar van mans
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
39,311
Reputation
10,410
Daps
151,012
Reppin
DFW
The supermax is fine the way it is. Just make it more difficult in who qualifies for it.

Besides, the owners could have theoretically said no to giving out those deals. I mean the Clippers essentially did.

Let's not forget that Philly also did the same thing in giving PJ Tucker 3 years fully guaranteed at age 37 and why he's still in the league till this day.
It's actually pretty dumb the way it is set up now, because all it does is force a team to spend more of it's salary cap (35%) to keep a player, while other teams can get said player for as low as 25% of the cap (depending on service time).

What they need to do is just give the player 35% of the cap for a supermax contract like they do now BUT only have it count on the books as a regular max for whatever that player service time is. Then if the player get's traded they contract goes from a super max to a regular max.
 

UpAndComing

Veteran
Joined
Aug 18, 2013
Messages
66,471
Reputation
16,272
Daps
289,216
The supermax is fine the way it is. Just make it more difficult in who qualifies for it.

Besides, the owners could have theoretically said no to giving out those deals. I mean the Clippers essentially did.

Let's not forget that Philly also did the same thing in giving PJ Tucker 3 years fully guaranteed at age 37 and why he's still in the league till this day.


I don't know why they don't make it as simple as, if you don't make All NBA a certain amount of years in the previous 5 years, you aren't eligible for the Supermax. Thee end
 

Thavoiceofthevoiceless

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 26, 2019
Messages
44,289
Reputation
5,338
Daps
137,057
Reppin
The Voiceless Realm
It's actually pretty dumb the way it is set up now, because all it does is force a team to spend more of it's salary cap (35%) to keep a player, while other teams can get said player for as low as 25% of the cap (depending on service time).

What they need to do is just give the player 35% of the cap for a supermax contract like they do now BUT only have it count on the books as a regular max for whatever that player service time is. Then if the player get's traded they contract goes from a super max to a regular max.
That's unfair to the player because what if it's another situation like Luka in where the player doesn't want to be traded, but it's up to the teams discretion?

It's called having a competitive advantage in wanting to keep the player that you drafted and developed. Now with that being said, the team should get some cap relief because of it, which I'd agree with.
 

Thavoiceofthevoiceless

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 26, 2019
Messages
44,289
Reputation
5,338
Daps
137,057
Reppin
The Voiceless Realm
I don't know why they don't make it as simple as, if you don't make All NBA a certain amount of years in the previous 5 years, you aren't eligible for the Supermax. Thee end
Luka has made five straight All NBA first team NBA appearances before this year. I can't sit here and say that he didn't deserve the supermax and could understand why he'd be mad about it though.

Making it more difficult would definitely help prevent one off situations in where a player could theoretically make All NBA team once and qualify for it.

Or even something like basing the dollar value based on which team you make and save the supermax for First Team.
 

FTBS

Superstar
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
19,821
Reputation
3,335
Daps
53,774
Reppin
NULL
PG did play in 74 games last season, but him actively valuing his podcast over being on the court is going to make him the prime example for why they need to add caveats to max/supermax deals.
Again...he didnt just start the podcast. They coveted dude for more than a year while he was chatty pattying. Also says a lot when he played 74 last year and still avg just over 50 for his time in LA. Dudes dont tend to get less injury prone in their mid-late 30s. And nonethless they coveted him for more than a year. That aint got nothing to do with the max or stealing. Thats all about orgs being dumb and at some point we gotta hold them accountable and stop looking for ways to let them of the hook...that they keep choosing to put themselves on.
 

KFBF

Superstar
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
10,582
Reputation
1,989
Daps
31,449
Reppin
Eagle, Colorado
Now with that being said, the team should get some cap relief because of it, which I'd agree with.
Yeah, I don't think teams.should be penalized for drafting well building teams. A certain percentage of supermax should not count against the cap if it's the team that drafted you or something like that.
 

FTBS

Superstar
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
19,821
Reputation
3,335
Daps
53,774
Reppin
NULL
I don't know why they don't make it as simple as, if you don't make All NBA a certain amount of years in the previous 5 years, you aren't eligible for the Supermax. Thee end
Or how about if you think he is worth it you pay him...if you dont you don't? Thats as simple as you can get.
 

FTBS

Superstar
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
19,821
Reputation
3,335
Daps
53,774
Reppin
NULL
Yeah, I don't think teams.should be penalized for drafting well building teams. A certain percentage of supermax should not count against the cap if it's the team that drafted you or something like that.
Cheap, incompetent owners (aka majority) dont want that :pachaha:. The goal is not to reward competence...its to maximize income while being incompetent.
 

UpAndComing

Veteran
Joined
Aug 18, 2013
Messages
66,471
Reputation
16,272
Daps
289,216
Or how about if you think he is worth it you pay him...if you dont you don't? Thats as simple as you can get.

Nah fukk that. Performance-Based contracts should be the way to go going forward

Everyone got mad at the New Orleans Pelicans that gave Zion a contract with a whole bunch of stipulations based on weight and games played. Now they look like geniuses looking at how Zion has been underwhelming
 

FTBS

Superstar
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
19,821
Reputation
3,335
Daps
53,774
Reppin
NULL
Nah fukk that. Performance-Based contracts should be the way to go going forward

Everyone got mad at the New Orleans Pelicans that gave Zion a contract with a whole bunch of stipulations based on weight and games played. Now they look like geniuses looking at how Zion has been underwhelming
Performance based revenue and profits too right?
 

KFBF

Superstar
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
10,582
Reputation
1,989
Daps
31,449
Reppin
Eagle, Colorado
Cheap, incompetent owners (aka majority) dont want that :pachaha:. The goal is not to reward competence...its to maximize income while being incompetent.
Right? They don't want OKC to be able to kep their guys together that they drafted they want the Bulls to remain profitable no matter how they cheap out and mismanage the team.
 

KFBF

Superstar
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
10,582
Reputation
1,989
Daps
31,449
Reppin
Eagle, Colorado

THE 101

House Painter
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
15,397
Reputation
5,126
Daps
76,389
Gj6vUyVWsAA2LqN



Bag secured :mjlol:
 
Top