duckbutta
eienaar van mans
It's actually pretty dumb the way it is set up now, because all it does is force a team to spend more of it's salary cap (35%) to keep a player, while other teams can get said player for as low as 25% of the cap (depending on service time).The supermax is fine the way it is. Just make it more difficult in who qualifies for it.
Besides, the owners could have theoretically said no to giving out those deals. I mean the Clippers essentially did.
Let's not forget that Philly also did the same thing in giving PJ Tucker 3 years fully guaranteed at age 37 and why he's still in the league till this day.
What they need to do is just give the player 35% of the cap for a supermax contract like they do now BUT only have it count on the books as a regular max for whatever that player service time is. Then if the player get's traded they contract goes from a super max to a regular max.