but, no racist who says they “hate ******s” is using the nikka variant.What about I hate ni**as?
Is it good?
I’ve actually seen him in real life in a poker room. He’s my daughter’s size.
"nikka" around a random white stranger gets a "you gotta chill that shyt out in my presence fam"you can find the use of “nikka” inappropriate and still understand the contextual difference between it and “******.”
the two views are not mutually exclusive.
but, no racist who says they “hate ******s” is using the nikka variant.
if someone says,” i hate nikka,” it’s joined by something else.
i.e, someone might say, “ i hate nikkas who drive hellcats.”
it’s contextual. i’m not defending the use of “nikka,” for what it’s worth. just saying that nobody attacking black people is using “nikka.”
That's why the black and brown talking point has always been a crock of bullshyt from the beginning. They only wanna align with us when it's beneficial to themY'all really think these illegal b*stards are coming here to unite with us. Black brown unity
how so? it’s common sense. i’m arguing that there is clearly a contextual difference between the two terms. i am not defending its use by anyone non-black.The fact your brain is computing this type of stuff to type out there’s a high probability a helmet is securely strapped to your head, @I Really Mean It
so, there’s no contextual difference between “that’s my nikka” and “i hate ******s”?
how so? it’s common sense. i’m arguing that there is clearly a contextual difference between the two terms. i am not defending its use by anyone non-black.
a white supremacist isn’t going to say, “i hate nikkas.”
he or she will say, “i hate ******s.”
that’s all i am saying in response to @Matt504 ’s comment about if it would have been cool had garcia said “nikka” instead of “******”
Oh, he on that type of time?Not exactly surprising lol. It's only a matter of time before he kills himself anyway.