No No..it's like this. Kells is a good artists no doubt and probably one of the greatest song writers to ever grace the industry, but come on...we not doing this at all and there's a thin line between being one of the best versus being better than the man who made crowds passed out because of a fukking glove, a man who defined a true artist on the level of instrument, vocals, and writing, and a man who created "Songs in the Key of Life".
The thing with Kells is that his sexual and abrasive content became his overshadow from his more introspective content. If you play "I'll Be Your Angel" in the car not a single soul would give a damn, yet "Bump and Grind" comes on and the car becomes a setting for a orgy.
Meanwhile you can play every single track from MJ and folks will know whats up. Hell, one of my co workers played "When Doves Cry" and folks were quick to check out the system. Stevie...Stevie brehs . What album by Kells is fukking with these three:
I'll wait
I'm not a fan of over-sexual music, but how is the bolded a reason to disqualify Kellz?
This is not an excellent song ?:
Cmon. Musically, despite the over-sexual lyrics, this is a gem.
I'm not saying Kellz is better than them, but he's is clearly in the GOAT category with them.
Trust, I'm not dismissing Kells but dude really comes off as one dimensional to be considered better than the main three. In my mind, Chocolate Factory was the closest thing to his true opus because of all the bullshyt he was dealing with. Sadly, nobody puts Chocolate Factory up there with TP2.Com and R
He got a valid argument. Kellz is up there with the GOATS
yea Kellz aint got shyt on MJ hits wise cmon now
MJ transformed music he was like the face for the 80s and 90s
Nah fam. Kellz got some deep ass songs in every direction: religious, party, sex, introspection, etc. In every direction, he got GOATS songs, written and produced by him. He's more than good. He's a genius.
Mike did tooKellz produced his own music.
Not really. R Kelly has more good music than MJ and Prince. Stevie maybe not.