Booking Decisions You Would've Made That Would Have Fuccked The Company Due To Your Bias

[Mr. Manhattan]

The thread title is conflicting. Are we purpously trying to ruin the company?
Most of my bias would have made the company better

Macho Man wouldve beaten Hogan at Wrestlemania.

Ted Dibiase wouldve had a significant. World title run amd make him a nasty heel that you wanted to see lose

But they were both over. So the conpany still wouldve been fine

Im thinking too hard on this.. Or the thread just sucks

 

[Dreamzeedream]

I would have put Ryback over Punk, Cena, Rock, & Have him take on the streak where he would either get his first L or end the streak

Dude would have been a legend

What's crazy that would actually worked. Ryback was over as fukk at one point

 

[Silkk]

What's crazy that would actually worked. Ryback was over as fukk at one point

That night he saved Vince from Punk was INSANE. Had the fukking building shaking

 

[Nintendough]

Would have made Scott Hall champ in both feds with a major push and long term goals.


Nash would have been booking from the day he signed.


Would have given Bret the title the night he debuted on WCW.


Would have given Fandango a world title run during the craze.


Would have not let CM Punk get pinned for over 2 years.

I can go on and on.

 

[Toe Jay Simpson]

What's crazy that would actually worked. Ryback was over as fukk at one point

A wrestler gets a once in a lifetime moment like that where the people are telling you they want you to take their money. It had to be, at least for me, the most blatant blown opportunity to create a new main event superstar in the last 15 years

 

[Dreamzeedream]

That night he saved Vince from Punk was INSANE. Had the fukking building shaking

Smh another what could of been

 

[Dreamzeedream]

A wrestler gets a once in a lifetime moment like that where the people are telling you they want you to take their money. It had to be, at least for me, the most blatant blown opportunity to create a new main event superstar in the last 15 years

That's what I'm saying. I know he was reckless in the ring from what oink was saying but it like once they turned him heel. Everything went downhill

 

[No Ma’am]

I would’ve put Disco Inferno in Hogan’s spot.

 

[Shadow]

Booker T over HHH at Wrestlemania 19
R-Truth over Cena at Capitol Punishment 2011
Mark Henry over Cena at MITB 2013
Would have been building towards Lashley vs. Lesnar ever since Lashley rejoined the company.
Sting would have NEVER even met HHH or Seth Rollins. You do Sting vs. Cena and Sting vs. Taker at two separate Manias.

Things is, none of these would have hurt the company.

Also in WCW Goldberg would have never lost his streak. So when Goldberg showed up in WWE his streak would be in tact and you could do a streak vs. streak match at Mania against the Undertaker.

 

[Silkk]

Booker T over HHH at Wrestlemania 19
R-Truth over Cena at Capitol Punishment 2011
Mark Henry over Cena at MITB 2013
Would have been building towards Lashley vs. Lesnar ever since Lashley rejoined the company.
Sting would have NEVER even met HHH or Seth Rollins. You do Sting vs. Cena and Sting vs. Taker at two separate Manias.

Things is, none of these would have hurt the company.

Also in WCW Goldberg would have never lost his streak. So when Goldberg showed up in WWE his streak would be in tact and you could do a streak vs. streak match at Mania against the Undertaker.

So why post them?

 

[Shadow]

So why post them?

I don't have biases that would have hurt the company and I wanted to participate.
Bias is a part of your thread title as if bias makes the booking decision bad by default.

 

[Silkk]

I don't have biases that would have hurt the company and I wanted to participate.
Bias is a part of your thread title as if bias makes the booking decision bad by default.

You don't have a favorite wrestler that you would have given preferential treatment?

 

[stro]

Booker T over HHH at Wrestlemania 19
R-Truth over Cena at Capitol Punishment 2011
Mark Henry over Cena at MITB 2013
Would have been building towards Lashley vs. Lesnar ever since Lashley rejoined the company.
Sting would have NEVER even met HHH or Seth Rollins. You do Sting vs. Cena and Sting vs. Taker at two separate Manias.

Things is, none of these would have hurt the company.

Also in WCW Goldberg would have never lost his streak. So when Goldberg showed up in WWE his streak would be in tact and you could do a streak vs. streak match at Mania against the Undertaker.

This is some real hindsight thinking, as the streak wasn't even an acknowledged thing for Taker until 2001, but really didn't start to matter until 2002, 3 1/2 years after Goldberg lost.

 

[Shadow]

You don't have a favorite wrestler that you would have given preferential treatment?

Nah, everybody I like already won the belt.

Even giving Mr. Perfect the belt wouldn't have hurt the company.

If anything I would have given less title runs to people like Cena, Orton, HHH and Edge.

Around the last few years I'd be building up Cesaro, Rusev, and Big E title runs but those wouldn't hurt the company either.

 

[Shadow]

This is some real hindsight thinking, as the streak wasn't even an acknowledged thing for Taker until 2001, but really didn't start to matter until 2002, 3 1/2 years after Goldberg lost.

Oh yeah, I know. That's more if I had a crystal ball type booking.