Boiler Room: The Official Stock Market Discussion

Domingo Halliburton

Handmade in USA
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
12,613
Reputation
1,370
Daps
15,445
Reppin
Brooklyn Without Limits
sounds to me like an SEC problem not a computer one. If I lost money yesterday on Avon I'd be ready to sue the SEC.

Avon Manipulation May Have Been Designed For Algorithms, Not Humans

Comment Now
A filing that hit the Edgar system today purporting to be from an entity called PTG Capital Partners Ltd said it had launched a tender offer for Avon at $18.75 a share. Avon stock leaped more than 20% to $8 a share at 11:35 a.m. on the fake news, before falling just as quickly as Avon said there was no such offer. And anybody who actually read the Edgar filing should have known that, as the price was fanciful and whoever wrote the release forgot to spellcheck it for “TPG,” which was interposed several times in language that was hooked from the multibillion-dollar private equity firm’s website.

“This was a fraud designed for algorithmic traders,” said John Fahy, a former SEC enforcement attorney and member of Whitaker Chalk in Fort Worth, Texas, where “PTG’s” lawyer was supposedly located and where TPG is based. “It was not designed to fool anybody who’d actually read it. It was designed to fool some system that scans SEC filings for certain words but doesn’t actually read them.”

That raises a second question, Fahy said: Since securities fraud laws target information that is “material” to investors and this shouldn’t have fooled any human investors, does it still meet that standard?

“I would not be surprised to see someone argue that no reasonable investor could have possibly relied on the filing due to its absurdity and automatic trades by algorithmic trading programs cannot cause a stupid filing to meet the materiality standard,” he said.

“The Supreme Court standard is to `significantly alter’ the total mix of information available to a reasonable investor. Since the algorithms are unreasoning, don’t actually seek to understand the filing, and are just looking for keywords to get a brief time advantage, how can they be deemed to be a `reasonable’ investor?” he asked.

That doesn’t mean the scammer or scammers can’t be brought to justice. It’s still wire fraud to send the SEC a false takeover statement. It can be securities fraud in the form of a “scheme to defraud” to trade on information intended to change a stock’s price on false premises. And misusing the EDGAR system is a criminal offense.

The scam also highlights a potentially critical weakness in the SEC’s electronic filing system. While Edgar requires electronic filers to submit a notarized Form ID, including a tax ID, to obtain a password for placing notices directly on the website, filers can fake the notarization and put zeros in the field for the tax ID to get a temporary pass, Fahy said. The Internal Revenue Service is taking a month or more to provide tax IDs for private companies, he said, while the SEC deadline for filing a Form D for a newly formed business on the sale of securities is only 15 days.

“EDGAR is a remarkably effective way to potentially disseminate fake information,” he said.

According to my colleague Antoine Gara, PTG listed a Michael Trose, of Trose & Cox PLLC as a contact. The address of Trose & Cox was listed as 777 Main Street, Fort Worth, Texas, and with a phone number: (817) 887-8000. A call to the firm was answered by a representative at Atrium Executive Business Centers, who characterized Trose & Cox as “bogus” and not a tenant.

If the SEC were to investigate the Avon matter, Gara says, it might look to afake 2012 December 18 tender for The Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory.

In that instance, a Kings Cross, London-based firm called PST Capital Group LTD offered to buy the company for $13 a share and listed bogus contacts in the U.K. and California. The ‘About PST Capital’ section of that filing also copied boilerplate language from established PE firm GCTR.

PST Capital is a private equity firm that pioneered “The Leaders Strategy” – finding and partnering with exceptional leaders,” the filing stated, a copy ofGCTR’s website. The fake tender offer from PST, sans typos, caused a spike in the trading volume of Rocky Mountain Chocolate.

Below, the fake EDGAR filing:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/danielf...have-been-designed-for-algorithms-not-humans/



so bad


:heh:
 

Bernie Madoff

Banned
Joined
Jun 23, 2012
Messages
11,925
Reputation
-2,399
Daps
18,686
Reppin
Otisville, Federal Correctional Institution
Avon Manipulation May Have Been Designed For Algorithms, Not Humans

Comment Now
A filing that hit the Edgar system today purporting to be from an entity called PTG Capital Partners Ltd said it had launched a tender offer for Avon at $18.75 a share. Avon stock leaped more than 20% to $8 a share at 11:35 a.m. on the fake news, before falling just as quickly as Avon said there was no such offer. And anybody who actually read the Edgar filing should have known that, as the price was fanciful and whoever wrote the release forgot to spellcheck it for “TPG,” which was interposed several times in language that was hooked from the multibillion-dollar private equity firm’s website.

“This was a fraud designed for algorithmic traders,” said John Fahy, a former SEC enforcement attorney and member of Whitaker Chalk in Fort Worth, Texas, where “PTG’s” lawyer was supposedly located and where TPG is based. “It was not designed to fool anybody who’d actually read it. It was designed to fool some system that scans SEC filings for certain words but doesn’t actually read them.”

That raises a second question, Fahy said: Since securities fraud laws target information that is “material” to investors and this shouldn’t have fooled any human investors, does it still meet that standard?

“I would not be surprised to see someone argue that no reasonable investor could have possibly relied on the filing due to its absurdity and automatic trades by algorithmic trading programs cannot cause a stupid filing to meet the materiality standard,” he said.

“The Supreme Court standard is to `significantly alter’ the total mix of information available to a reasonable investor. Since the algorithms are unreasoning, don’t actually seek to understand the filing, and are just looking for keywords to get a brief time advantage, how can they be deemed to be a `reasonable’ investor?” he asked.

That doesn’t mean the scammer or scammers can’t be brought to justice. It’s still wire fraud to send the SEC a false takeover statement. It can be securities fraud in the form of a “scheme to defraud” to trade on information intended to change a stock’s price on false premises. And misusing the EDGAR system is a criminal offense.

The scam also highlights a potentially critical weakness in the SEC’s electronic filing system. While Edgar requires electronic filers to submit a notarized Form ID, including a tax ID, to obtain a password for placing notices directly on the website, filers can fake the notarization and put zeros in the field for the tax ID to get a temporary pass, Fahy said. The Internal Revenue Service is taking a month or more to provide tax IDs for private companies, he said, while the SEC deadline for filing a Form D for a newly formed business on the sale of securities is only 15 days.

“EDGAR is a remarkably effective way to potentially disseminate fake information,” he said.

According to my colleague Antoine Gara, PTG listed a Michael Trose, of Trose & Cox PLLC as a contact. The address of Trose & Cox was listed as 777 Main Street, Fort Worth, Texas, and with a phone number: (817) 887-8000. A call to the firm was answered by a representative at Atrium Executive Business Centers, who characterized Trose & Cox as “bogus” and not a tenant.

If the SEC were to investigate the Avon matter, Gara says, it might look to afake 2012 December 18 tender for The Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory.

In that instance, a Kings Cross, London-based firm called PST Capital Group LTD offered to buy the company for $13 a share and listed bogus contacts in the U.K. and California. The ‘About PST Capital’ section of that filing also copied boilerplate language from established PE firm GCTR.

PST Capital is a private equity firm that pioneered “The Leaders Strategy” – finding and partnering with exceptional leaders,” the filing stated, a copy ofGCTR’s website. The fake tender offer from PST, sans typos, caused a spike in the trading volume of Rocky Mountain Chocolate.

Below, the fake EDGAR filing:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/danielf...have-been-designed-for-algorithms-not-humans/



so bad


:heh:
I love it :skip:
 

Swagaveli

Pro
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
491
Reputation
100
Daps
579
Reppin
Europe
Great to see you brehs doing this shyt big. Salute

On today, I've dd'd the shyt out of URBN, and I'm going nutz deep in it for earnings after the bell today. Expect a 5%ish pop. Undervalued, stock has went down too much since last ER for no good reason etc.

Take a look and holla if ya feel me
 

franknitty711

All Star
Bushed
Supporter
Joined
May 30, 2012
Messages
2,950
Reputation
196
Daps
5,222
Reppin
Bay Area
Great to see you brehs doing this shyt big. Salute

On today, I've dd'd the shyt out of URBN, and I'm going nutz deep in it for earnings after the bell today. Expect a 5%ish pop. Undervalued, stock has went down too much since last ER for no good reason etc.

Take a look and holla if ya feel me

Its hard for me to support any clothing retailer after what @Bernie Madoff predicted with the Kohls drop. If you are confident tho :lupe:, this is a swing play for a quick striker...
 

Swagaveli

Pro
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
491
Reputation
100
Daps
579
Reppin
Europe
Its hard for me to support any clothing retailer after what @Bernie Madoff predicted with the Kohls drop. If you are confident tho :lupe:, this is a swing play for a quick striker...

The clothing retailer sector is a complete bloodbath. URBN however has a solid overall turning point type thing going on with it's business and it's way better positioned to not get fukked by the current environment - in my DD anyway. It also doesn't hurt that it's really oversold.

But again, I'm no Halliburton or Madoff :whoa:
 
Top