Boiler Room: The Official Stock Market Discussion

Starski

Superstar
Joined
Feb 12, 2015
Messages
6,163
Reputation
1,300
Daps
18,174
@Slim
@dora_da_destroyer @GoldenGlove

like I get the rationale behind including those types of companies I’m just more :dahell: at the fact that why don’t they just include the underlying companies that have those direct ties to space travel.

like in a way this says

“yeah, 3D printing will be used in space travel, but with the X amount of companies in the ARK 3D printing ETF, we have no idea which ones will be penetrating that business line. So fukk it, just use the ETF.”
 

dora_da_destroyer

Master Baker
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
65,301
Reputation
16,212
Daps
268,122
Reppin
Oakland
@Slim
@dora_da_destroyer @GoldenGlove

like I get the rationale behind including those types of companies I’m just more :dahell: at the fact that why don’t they just include the underlying companies that have those direct ties to space travel.

like in a way this says

“yeah, 3D printing will be used in space travel, but with the X amount of companies in the ARK 3D printing ETF, we have no idea which ones will be penetrating that business line. So fukk it, just use the ETF.”
lol, i feel like all of ARK's ETF's stretch the line by including some of the most tangentially related companies
 
Last edited:

NatiboyB

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
65,179
Reputation
3,826
Daps
103,525
lol, i feel like all of ARK's ETF's stretch the line by including some of the most tangentially related companies

rhats how come I was more comfortable with ARKK since it just mixed them all up as opposed to say arkw or arkg for example.
 

GoldenGlove

😐😑😶😑😐
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
59,657
Reputation
5,760
Daps
140,513
they are holding off on spec names which tells me they don't think growth can bounce back anytime soon.
:usure:
Cathie Wood’s ETFs Ditch Ownership Caps, Add SPAC Warning

This actually says the exact opposite.

In a filing late last week, Ark altered the prospectuses for its exchange-traded funds to remove clauses limiting its exposure and concentration risks.

The changes eliminate a 30% cap on how much of each fund’s assets could be invested in the securities of a single entity, and a 20% limit on the amount of a company’s shares an ETF could own.

It also introduced language acknowledging funds may buy into blank-check firms and noting the risks of buying shares in special-purpose acquisition companies that haven’t yet decided what businesses they’ll own. The ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ticker ARKQ) last week bought shares of a SPAC backed by tennis star Serena Williams.

These are eye-catching changes for Ark, founded by Wood in 2014. Concerns have swirled around the New York-based firm in recent months after a stellar year saw ETF assets surge at one point to more than $60 billion. Ark invests in companies involved with disruptive trends, which mean it has a limited pool of targets in which to deploy that money.

“It seems like they’re willing to take on more single-stock risk if they truly believe in a company,” said Mohit Bajaj, director of ETFs for WallachBeth Capital. “It’s truly active management.”

Auntie Cathie is with the shyts from what this article is saying in relation to their recent changes to their exposure limits
:mjlit:
 

GoldenGlove

😐😑😶😑😐
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
59,657
Reputation
5,760
Daps
140,513
@Slim
@dora_da_destroyer @GoldenGlove

like I get the rationale behind including those types of companies I’m just more :dahell: at the fact that why don’t they just include the underlying companies that have those direct ties to space travel.

like in a way this says

“yeah, 3D printing will be used in space travel, but with the X amount of companies in the ARK 3D printing ETF, we have no idea which ones will be penetrating that business line. So fukk it, just use the ETF.”
I feel you, but it's a glimpse into what the space sector will be comprised of. We typically just think and focus on space travel, but there's hella other factors beyond that. For example, the companies that manufacture the parts for the satellites and spacecrafts will get exposure here. I think it's only a matter of time before some of the tickers that we've been kind of expecting to be in here are added. The holdings did feel like some trolling ass shyt tho

:mjlol:



I have 600 SFTW warrants btw
:francis:


Regardless of if it's in the ETF or not, I still have conviction in what they're doing and that it'll go on a run within the next 3 years
 

GoldenGlove

😐😑😶😑😐
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
59,657
Reputation
5,760
Daps
140,513
the holdings says otherwise but we will see..
True. But can you blame her for not buying a lot right now when tech, growth and high speculative stocks are shaky. Maybe she's waiting to see if some of the ones we expected to be in fall down some more before purchasing?
 
Top