Warriors was expected to be a 35 win team in 2013....
Miss me with all this vague ass generic nonsense.
This is what happens when you let keyboard militancy rot your brain from the inside-out, you lose all understanding of hoops (which I suspect for you wasn't much to begin with). Mark ain't got shyt to do with the dynasty they created; he's a small initial component that ended up being replaced by a better model.
If he was still the coach they would've have seen any success. In fact, he and GS would've parted ways long ago even if he stayed on past 2014.
If he continued to be the coach, Dray would've ended up being a more traditional PF where he ultimately would've been traded for someone with more perceived offensive ability because he wouldn't have moved the needle playing in that sort of a role. All this Draymond running point and being a key figure in everything they do, allowing him to be the best version of himself, wouldn't have been. The nucleus behind their success has been harnessing Steph's ability to make everyone else's job easier, allowing them to develop their games and give them freedom in an equal-opportunity offense, and using that to generate rhythm, confidence and belief that we otherwise wouldn't have seen with the shyt Mark was running.
The Warriors literally went from one of the worst ball-movement teams to the best after he was fired. That's what their chemistry was built off. Chemistry that wouldn't have existed with some shyt of running post-ups for Klay as a go-to action.
Steph would've stayed being more of a traditional PG and probably would've had a similar career-trajectory to Dame, where everyone would be talking about how he wasn't good enough and how he needed better teammates to win, and not someone who was utilized in a fashion that actually made his teammates better,
breaking the glass ceiling on what it means to be a PG.