Black St Louis Restaurant has Age minimum of 30 for women and 35 for men

[Brolic]

Why 30 for women?
Female hoodrats of all ages tend to be more louder/aggressive/obnoxious than men.

 

[Ray D’Angelo Harris]

I Me and my lady the same age and im about to turn 43

 

[BmoreGorilla]

Yea I been around for a minute

 

[Mr. Jack Napier]

So he wants a club full of

Majority of those folks he's catering too don't have the funds (childcare, etc) or the energy to pack his club. LOL, good luck with that.

 

[generic-username]

we're talking about 35 and 30 year olds here...This ain't some seniors brunch. The propensity for fukkry doesn't go down significantly between the ages of 25 and 35.

Actually it does. Most of these men who shoot up house parties and clubs are usually in their 20s

 

[thenatural]

I thought this was because they have some outrageous prices. Honestly, you and your SO or date could get outta there under or slightly over $100. But it's a basic ass menu for what they're trying to do with the policy. I know shyt can get heavy in St. Louis, but like somebody said, people in their 30s can do stupid shyt. Trust, me I know. They picked those ages because they're in their early to mid 30s.

 

[AllHolosEve]

this is non-story. there's a million lounges near my crib and ALL of them enforce a 30-35 year old age minimum.

-It's not a non-story. It's actually interesting if you're from a place where they don't enforce this at ANY lounge.

 

[R.E.N. Spells Ren]

Private businesses can legally discriminate based on age *so long as it isn't against a protected group*.

Men below 35 aren't.

Still, the policy is problematic as, like you stated, some 30-year old dude can still initiate some legal action against it.

Not a lawyer, so I could be wrong.

​

Gender is a protected class. That’s where this becomes murky. I’m not sure having different age requirements for each gender would stand up to legal scrutiny if pressed.

 

[Nigerianwonder]

Gender is a protected class. That’s where this becomes murky. I’m not sure having different age requirements for each gender would stand up to legal scrutiny if pressed.

The loophole i see is if a 30 year old man claims he identifies as a woman. Then they would have to let him in or they can be sued.

 

[kt773]

I ain't mad at it. Though don't think you're not gonna get no ignorant 30 somethings coming in there.

That’s why it’s gonna fail lol

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Gender is a protected class. That’s where this becomes murky. I’m not sure having different age requirements for each gender would stand up to legal scrutiny if pressed.

Yeah, this is beyond me. All I found was it being illegal to gender discriminate in regards to employment and goods/services provision by private businesses that receive Federal funding.

Then I think about bars, casinos, clubs, etc. that do exactly that.

​

 

[AAKing23]

I ain't old enough, that's for y'all flabbyheads I guess