Black St Louis Restaurant has Age minimum of 30 for women and 35 for men

B86

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
13,914
Reputation
1,851
Daps
44,767
Reppin
Da Burgh
That's complete cap.:usure:
How is that cap? It's the sad truth.

I was talking to a female I grew up with just yesterday and she called me old because I'm not into the childish shyt I was into 20 years ago. I had to tell her straight up I feel like I matured but nobody around me did, somehow. And we are all pushing 40
 

ThrobbingHood

Breh&Breh Associates™
Joined
Nov 11, 2017
Messages
31,855
Reputation
15,687
Daps
227,101
Simple dress code solution:

Men must wear their pants up to their waist. Belt required.

Women can’t enter wearing bonnets or acrylic nails longer than 2 inches.

There you go. I’ve just reduced your ratchet clientele by 93%. :unimpressed:
 

Arizax2

All Star
Joined
Mar 20, 2017
Messages
3,196
Reputation
286
Daps
10,068
Most restaurants fail in their first year. Trying to do this right now may not be the best thing. Hope they check the legality of it so they don't come across a complaint of ageism. One way to avoid the drama is to jack up the price high enough that the youngsters would avoid it and put together a dress code policy. Age minimum is a gray area and could be found to be more of a hassle then it's worth. Even if it's legal, they may come across 1 or 2 potential lawsuits a year they would have to battle. Not worth it.
 

BmoreGorilla

Veteran
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
38,661
Reputation
29,757
Daps
250,722
Reppin
Man, woman, and child

UnQuantized

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
4,056
Reputation
1,101
Daps
16,671
Might as well go all the way and have a string quartet playing early 20th century atonal music
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
44,630
Reputation
8,094
Daps
121,489
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Requiring certain people to be a specific age and others to be another age is discrimination.
Private businesses can legally discriminate based on age *so long as it isn't against a protected group*.

Men below 35 aren't.

Still, the policy is problematic as, like you stated, some 30-year old dude can still initiate some legal action against it.

Not a lawyer, so I could be wrong.

:yeshrug:
 
Top