but it's been empty and vacant for years. I understand the threat of increased pricessmart move, they realize it's just 1 step towards higher rent/property taxes. hold off gentrification as long as possible.
There's a Trader Joes in downtown BK and Glendale Queens.there's only 3 trader joes... all in manhattan... 1 fukking borough.
anyways if trader joes not gonna be integral to the black community and help it out and displace them, then can anyone blame black residents for wanting to keep their property values stable so they wont be priced out?
Didn't read the whole thread but its an interesting topic because this story basically serves as a model for how we are going to treat the ghetto all across the country.
What exactly is the solution to improving the standard of living in the ghetto in such a way that the people living there can reap the benefits? I just don't get it. Bring in black businesses? I guess so. Except right now there aren't many black businesses you can bring to these neighborhoods.
It seems to me like the reason why residents of the ghetto wouldn't benefit from a trader joes is perhaps because a lot of these people are unemployable. Even if you brought in a black business, I'm not sure how that would change anything. A black person is not going to hire someone unemployable just because he's black. And even if he gave the person a chance, he would soon regret it.
I'm not sure what to think so I'm open to all ideas. I just think there's something very wrong with saying we need to keep the slums a slum, keep the ghetto a ghetto.
Does anyone know where do these poor people go after their neighborhood has been gentrified? Do they just remain homeless?
Didn't read the whole thread but its an interesting topic because this story basically serves as a model for how we are going to treat the ghetto all across the country.
What exactly is the solution to improving the standard of living in the ghetto in such a way that the people living there can reap the benefits? I just don't get it. Bring in black businesses? I guess so. Except right now there aren't many black businesses you can bring to these neighborhoods.
It seems to me like the reason why residents of the ghetto wouldn't benefit from a trader joes is perhaps because a lot of these people are unemployable. Even if you brought in a black business, I'm not sure how that would change anything. A black person is not going to hire someone unemployable just because he's black. And even if he gave the person a chance, he would soon regret it.
I'm not sure what to think so I'm open to all ideas. I just think there's something very wrong with saying we need to keep the slums a slum, keep the ghetto a ghetto.
Does anyone know where do these poor people go after their neighborhood has been gentrified? Do they just remain homeless?
There are 5 within NYC, 3 in Manhattan, 1 in BK and 1 in QueensIt's better than nothing there's no Trader Joe's in NYC area as far as I know.
Didn't read the whole thread but its an interesting topic because this story basically serves as a model for how we are going to treat the ghetto all across the country.
What exactly is the solution to improving the standard of living in the ghetto in such a way that the people living there can reap the benefits? I just don't get it. Bring in black businesses? I guess so. Except right now there aren't many black businesses you can bring to these neighborhoods.
It seems to me like the reason why residents of the ghetto wouldn't benefit from a trader joes is perhaps because a lot of these people are unemployable. Even if you brought in a black business, I'm not sure how that would change anything. A black person is not going to hire someone unemployable just because he's black. And even if he gave the person a chance, he would soon regret it.
I'm not sure what to think so I'm open to all ideas. I just think there's something very wrong with saying we need to keep the slums a slum, keep the ghetto a ghetto.
Does anyone know where do these poor people go after their neighborhood has been gentrified? Do they just remain homeless?
the small city is frankenmuth in michigan. they are a little city with little retail stores. it's quite a beautiful city. with their own little stores that's unique with their community.You know there was a story about white residents kicking wal mart out of their neighborhood before it even came, so black people not the only one's who know what happens when you bring a large corporate entity into a poor neighborhood.
http://michiganlawyerblog.wordpress...-award-in-frankenmuth-wal-mart-deal-reversed/As reported in Lawyers Weekly, the plaintiffs in May 2005 signed an agreement to sell 37 1/2 acres of their land to Wal-Mart for $4 million. But seven months later, the city passed an ordinance restricting the size of buildings inside the zoning area that their land sits on to 65,000 square feet. As a result, Wal-Mart backed out.
I just went to city data to do some researching
title is misleading, and of course over zealous people with personal agendas are eating it up
walmart is NOTHING like trader joes.You know there was a story about white residents kicking wal mart out of their neighborhood before it even came, so black people not the only one's who know what happens when you bring a large corporate entity into a poor neighborhood.
walmart is NOTHING like trader joes.
Whether or not you want to admit it, but there is a class issue here.
People with more money and education shop at trader joes.
I'd be HONORED to have one in my neighborhood.
Because they are retarded. the whole foods in detroit.... has that CAC feel, but in less than a years time.. madd black people have jobs there and it's slowing becoming a place i can go to see bad bytches...
and i don't like white girls.
NTM the health reasons.. WHY wouldn't our collectively unhealthy asses want traderjoes and wholefoods.. We at least could make our own versions.
and side note: I pep all the rat hoes using the bridge cards there. Both places accept stamps, so IT's a win win win