Black People And Capitalism DON'T Mix
- Thread starter Medicate
- Start date
theworldismine13
God Emperor of SOHH
whats your point? you are waiting for the white man to get off the negro?
i never said it would be easy, but imo if black people dont turn to to capitalism, black people will stay at the bottom, capitalism is one of the most powerful weapons against white supremacy
@ how little of what is being said in this thread actually pertains to free market capitalism.
tulsa oklahoma 1921
theworldismine13
God Emperor of SOHH
what about it?
how capitalism lost to [state sponsored] white supremacy terrorism.
Last edited:
theworldismine13
God Emperor of SOHH
because that was a lone outpost overwhlemed with numbers
Capitalism made the black people rich and self sufficient that is the lesson of Tulsa
tulsa, ok is just the most known. there were plenty of other lesser known tulsas all over the country..
did capitalism save ghadafi despite him being one of the richest men ever on earth
didn't white supremacy use your boy to kill him they lied to you this is capitalism yet they have other organizations like the cia is doing something else...
edit: also asians don't exactly practise capitalism. and the west has changed up and incorporated that model. democratic capitalism can't really compete with what's going on in the far east.
Last edited:
did capitalism save ghadafi despite him being one of the richest men ever on earth
i missed you fam
i'm just outchea having fun
i missed you fam
theworldismine13
God Emperor of SOHH
tulsa, ok is just the most known. there were plenty of other lesser known tulsas all over the country..
did capitalism save ghadafi despite him being one of the richest men ever on earth
they lied to you this is capitalism yet they have other organizations like the cia is doing something else...
edit: also asians don't exactly practise capitalism. and the west has changed up and incorporated that model. democratic capitalism can't really compete with what's going on in the far east.
And those other Tulsa's were rich, so what's your point?
Money is just the first step in gaining power, after you gain economic power, then you move on to political power and then you move to weapons, weapons is who saves you but having a capitalistic economy is the foundation
I have no idea why you are equating ghadafi to capitalism, how is ghadafi a capitalist? and besides I think he was a decrepit arab dictator and I'm glad he got taken out, good riddance
Actually asians do practice capitalism, at least China, Japan, Korea, Singapore and Taiwan do
What is it about asian counrties that isn't capitalistic?
gadafi is just as capitalistic as china
china and russia (and the united states) are where they are with hardly any democratic capitalism in place.
let's say gadafi wasn't capitalistic. wasn't that much better for them that their current situation?
when they're the #1 nation in africa (vs south africa, nigeria, egypt) they must be doing something right. they didn't need capitalism. now their shyt worse than tusla, ok.
whatever system libya had before her fall i'm sure was much better than many capitalist nations.
the japanese govt runs their companies. over there we've had to "keiretsu" certain industries too.
all that quantative easing crap is all borrowed from the east.
capitalism is a lie breh. it's a good sell. but still a lie...
human nature and our society calls more for socialim and communism than capitalism.. i'm not sure we've really advanced as a people compared to the socialist/religion days. man has just kinda turned into something else with this capitalist-worshipping of money and meeting year end expectations.
theworldismine13
God Emperor of SOHH
no its not, ghadafi was more of a socialist, the government was providing a lot social benefits and all the money was coming from oi, that isnt capitalism
capitalism would mean a country that is encouraging private enterprise, private enterprise was not promoted in lybia the way it is in china
i dont know what this means
libya still isnt capitalist before or after ghadafi so i dont understand what your point is or why lybia is part of the conversation
if you admire ghdafi thats fine, but ghadafii lybia represents the problem with socialist political systems, it puts power in the governments hands, the reason why lybia crumpled after ghadafi was because ghadafi had suffocated and killed all the leadership of lybia during his reign, that isnt the way to build a stable country, building a country around an individual pretty much means they country will fall apart once the individual leaves
japan is a capitalist country, its that simple
china is more complicated because they were communist and till this day are in a midst a of a transition to capitalism, but pretty much the entire far east is capitalist or transitioning to capitalism
dont really care, black people should turn to capitalism to increase our economic and political power, period
its not to make the world a better place
you talk a lot of text book shyt that doesn't apply in the real world. you say libya is socialist but america isn't?
how did capitalism handle too big to fail corporations
gadafi was a dictator that oppressed his people living good
when i'm president i'll take food stamps off all white folk cause they take most stamps and cause capitalism brehs... "white folks and socialism don't mix"
you'll be one of the advisors of my economic team
theworldismine13
God Emperor of SOHH
the problem is that we having 2 different conversation, im saying black people need to use capitalism to increase or economic and politcal power, period
i didnt say anything about making this world a better place, that isnt the standard that im using
do you want to talk about making the world a better place or do you want to talk about how to increase the economic and political power of black people, those are 2 different conversations
im not even understanding what you are trying to say, in your mind what do you call libya?
it handled it awfully, america is an example of the bad side of capitalism where to much power is in the hands of corporations and a few rich people
yeah ghadaffi was dictator and its a good thing obama took him out
i think obama did a bad followup and lybya is doing bad but on the good side, democracy is actually flourishing all over africa, ghadafi represented one of the last dictators of africa, there are few others but he was the big one, him being gone is another step toward a democratic african continent
go ahead and do that
i didnt say anything about making this world a better place, that isnt the standard that im using
do you want to talk about making the world a better place or do you want to talk about how to increase the economic and political power of black people, those are 2 different conversations
yeah libya is socialist, because its a system that discouraged private enterprise and was based on government benefitsyou talk a lot of text book shyt that doesn't apply in the real world. you say libya is socialist but america isn't?
im not even understanding what you are trying to say, in your mind what do you call libya?
how did capitalism handle too big to fail corporations
it handled it awfully, america is an example of the bad side of capitalism where to much power is in the hands of corporations and a few rich people
gadafi was a dictator that oppressed his people living good
yeah ghadaffi was dictator and its a good thing obama took him out
i think obama did a bad followup and lybya is doing bad but on the good side, democracy is actually flourishing all over africa, ghadafi represented one of the last dictators of africa, there are few others but he was the big one, him being gone is another step toward a democratic african continent
when i'm president i'll take food stamps off all white folk cause they take most stamps and cause capitalism brehs... "white folks and socialism don't mix"
you'll be one of the advisors of my economic team
go ahead and do that