Interesting, all of these sudden deaths happening as the vaccine is rolling out 
Black Lawyer & MSNBC Contributor Suddenly Dies
- Thread starter Stick Up Kid
- Start date
newworldafro
DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
It's like talking to a robot. "Smart" but pre-programmed to do only one thing...in this case stick to a narrative and don't critique it even if blatant evidence upends the narrative
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.miamiherald.com/news/coronavirus/article249955549.html
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.usnews.com/news/health-news/articles/2021-03-15/italy-france-germany-join-countries-suspending-astrazeneca-coronavirus-vaccine?context=amp
Last edited:
You're saying that if someone is sick from an actual disease and dies we're blaming the disease, but if two unrelated events happen 5 weeks apart with no evidence or symptoms connecting the two events, we're not blaming an unrelated event 5 weeks earlier for the death?
Wow, you make us look so illogical.
No I look at you as a cult follower who thinks that everyone should get something that isn't apart of their daily health regiment because of some greater good mentality. The very fact is 2 of the 4 major companies have decades of corruption and deaths on their roster, you are willingly to turn your head to it. Matter fact you support it.
Also side effects have never had a limitation to a time limit. Drugs effect others differently...the pills from Pfizer, Merck have been in people's symptoms for months before noticing severe side effects.
So you think that vaccines are like a drug that stays in someone's system? You're displaying your basic ignorance once again.
Then again, why should we expect good science from someone who claims that viruses don't even exist?
Vaccines are a drug but I'll wait to you come in and tell me they arent.
Good Science is allowing Big Pharma to run amok. Gotcha.
People can read exactly what you post and see how ignorant you are. Both of those links are about astrazeneca, a vaccine that has never been approved in the USA. That is exactly what I said, which you ignored....but then you complain that I'm the one talking to a robot?
I asked you to name the nation that has banned the Pfizer, Moderna, or Johnson & Johnson vaccines (the ones that are actually approved in the USA) and claimed they are causing problems. I'm still waiting.
Hey man, thanks for coming off sincere, I don't want to hate just tired of the misinformation.
Every one of your cells has DNA in the nucleus. This DNA can only be created by other DNA, and should never change (unless something causes a mutation), and should never leave the nucleus. The DNA is what replicates and makes new cells. The DNA creates strands of RNA which go into the rest of the cell and carry instructions.
Most viruses (including the Covid-19 virus) work by putting mRNA into your system. This mRNA is inserted into your cells by the virus, then those cells begin producing new viruses based on what the viral mRNA is telling them to do. However, the viruses do NOT change your DNA, they don't even go inside the nucleus. They don't affect your body's own genetic code at all.
For comparison, pretend our cell is an army at war, and the general is sending out instructions. The virus is a spy who sends out fake communications from the general that give the army new instructions. However, the virus does not change or replace the general, he's still there, it's only the communications that are different.
The mRNA vaccines were developed by studying the viruses and slightly copying how they work. Just like a virus, they don't go into your nucleus and they don't touch your DNA. The scientists have just taken one harmless part of the viral mRNA, the part that codes for a protein on the shell of the virus, and put that into the vaccine. Then your cells produce some of that protein, but not the rest of the virus. Your body learns to recognize that protein and prepares defenses against it, so that if you get the virus, it's already ready to attack. So in a sense the vaccine is giving your body a tiny glimpse of the virus, but only the most harmless part.
That's why it's ridiculous to me that people are saying they're not afraid of the virus but they're afraid of the vaccine. The vaccine is damn near the same as the virus, only with all the destructive parts removed. How can you be afraid of a weakened, impotent piece of the same thing you claimed was harmless?
Last edited:
You're saying that if someone is sick from an actual disease and dies we're blaming the disease, but if two unrelated events happen 5 weeks apart with no evidence or symptoms connecting the two events, we're not blaming an unrelated event 5 weeks earlier for the death?
Wow, you make us look so illogical.
THIS IS WHY ITS HARD
TO TAKE YOU SERIOUS.
I REFUSE TO BELIEVE
YOU THINK SHE GOT
HER 1ST & 2ND DOSE ON MARCH 1ST.
YOU ALREADY KNOW
THE 2ND SHOT COMES
ATLEAST 3 WEEKS AFTER THE 1ST.
YOURE PURPOSELY BEING
OBTUSE WITH THIS 5 WEEKS shyt.
YOU REALLY DONT GIVE A fukk
ABOUT ANYTHING BUT
SPREADING YOUR AGENDAS
REGARDLESS OF TOPIC.
TO TAKE YOU SERIOUS.
I REFUSE TO BELIEVE
YOU THINK SHE GOT
HER 1ST & 2ND DOSE ON MARCH 1ST.
YOU ALREADY KNOW
THE 2ND SHOT COMES
ATLEAST 3 WEEKS AFTER THE 1ST.
YOURE PURPOSELY BEING
OBTUSE WITH THIS 5 WEEKS shyt.
YOU REALLY DONT GIVE A fukk
ABOUT ANYTHING BUT
SPREADING YOUR AGENDAS
REGARDLESS OF TOPIC.
So if I proved that she got sick without ever taking that 2nd dose and thus all your bytching about the 2nd dose is bullshyt, would you fall back and admit you were wrong? You said all that without even checking which kind of vaccine she got to see if she even needed a second dose, or looking to see when she said she was feeling sick.THIS IS WHY ITS HARD
TO TAKE YOU SERIOUS.
I REFUSE TO BELIEVE
YOU THINK SHE GOT
HER 1ST & 2ND DOSE ON MARCH 1ST.
YOU ALREADY KNOW
THE 2ND SHOT COMES
ATLEAST 3 WEEKS AFTER THE 1ST.
YOURE PURPOSELY BEING
OBTUSE WITH THIS 5 WEEKS shyt.
This is the most unaware shyt I've seen in the thread - you just described exactly what you're doing.YOU REALLY DONT GIVE A fukk
ABOUT ANYTHING BUT
SPREADING YOUR AGENDAS
REGARDLESS OF TOPIC.
We're not the ones who start talking anti-scientific bullshyt every time someone dies.
So if I proved that she got sick without ever taking that 2nd dose and thus all your bytching about the 2nd dose is bullshyt, would you fall back and admit you were wrong? You said all that without even checking which kind of vaccine she got to see if she even needed a second dose, or looking to see when she said she was feeling sick.
This is the most unaware shyt I've seen in the thread - you just described exactly what you're doing.
We're not the ones who start talking anti-scientific bullshyt every time someone dies.
SHE GOT THE PFIZER.
YOURE THE ONE WHO
DIDNT CHECK OR EVEN
GIVE A fukk TO CHECK
BEFORE YOU STARTED PLAYING
YOUR GAMES.
YOURE THE ONE WHO
DIDNT CHECK OR EVEN
GIVE A fukk TO CHECK
BEFORE YOU STARTED PLAYING
YOUR GAMES.
So when did she get the 2nd dose? You're in here claiming she got a 2nd dose, when was it? Did you check?SHE GOT THE PFIZER.
YOURE THE ONE WHO
DIDNT CHECK OR EVEN
GIVE A fukk TO CHECK
BEFORE YOU STARTED PLAYING
YOUR GAMES.
SO NOW YOURE INSINUATINGSHE GOT THE 1ST DOSE
5 WEEKS AGO AND NEVER GOT
THE 2ND ONE?
YOU DIDNT EVEN KNOW
WHICH VACCINE SHE GOT.
STICK A FORK IN IT.
YOURE A JOKE.
Maybe if you'd done the simplest research you would know the answer to your own question.
SHE GOT THE 1ST DOSE
5 WEEKS AGO AND NEVER GOT
THE 2ND ONE?
YOU DIDNT EVEN KNOW
WHICH VACCINE SHE GOT.
STICK A FORK IN IT.
YOURE A JOKE.
Again, if I prove that she got sick without getting the 2nd dose, would you fall back and admit you were wrong?
I'm asking cause I've seen how much you juelz in the past, so I want you to put your word on it this time.
Didn’t Some Stanford scientist re engineer GHD vaccine and post it online a couple of weeks ago