Black Hispanic Juror says she feels "Zimmerman got away with murder"

Nigerianwonder

Superstar
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
6,705
Reputation
1,916
Daps
30,011
Reppin
NULL
LIke i said...no evidence of anything to point that Zimmerman's intent was to murder the guy. In her heart because she is biased like a lot of the posters here she felt Zimmerman had bad intentions but couldn't prove it and none of the evidence points to it and everything given went with Zimmerman's account or could not dispute Zimmerman's account. Which is the way the law works...if most of you are in the jury you would have done the same thing based on the law
The other juror stated she felt in her heart Zimmerman was good guy although and there was no evidence or way to prove that. But she stated that influenced her decision to find him not guilty. I guess her bias is ok with you.
 

Slystallion

Live to Strive
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
13,106
Reputation
-10,427
Daps
17,422
The other juror stated she felt in her heart Zimmerman was good guy although and there was no evidence or way to prove that. But she stated that influenced her decision to find him not guilty. I guess her bias is ok with you.

Regardless of how each one felt personally ultimately the evidence presented and shown is what decided the case and the juror who wanted to prosecute Zimmerman made that extremely clear she clearly states she had no evidence to convict Zimmerman like i've been saying all along

and yes it sucks that a 17 year old is no longer here because both sides acted in the wrong and it escalated to a tragic outcome
 

Nigerianwonder

Superstar
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
6,705
Reputation
1,916
Daps
30,011
Reppin
NULL
Regardless of how each one felt personally ultimately the evidence presented and shown is what decided the case and the juror who wanted to prosecute Zimmerman made that extremely clear she clearly states she had no evidence to convict Zimmerman like i've been saying all along

and yes it sucks that a 17 year old is no longer here because both sides acted in the wrong and it escalated to a tragic outcome
You don't need direct evidence. circumstantial evidence has convicts blacks all the time.
 

Type Username Here

Not a new member
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
16,368
Reputation
2,385
Daps
32,643
Reppin
humans
Regardless of how each one felt personally ultimately the evidence presented and shown is what decided the case and the juror who wanted to prosecute Zimmerman made that extremely clear she clearly states she had no evidence to convict Zimmerman like i've been saying all along

and yes it sucks that a 17 year old is no longer here because both sides acted in the wrong and it escalated to a tragic outcome


Only one side acted in the wrong. Whether or not you want to argue what the law says, that's another issue. But Zimmerman was told not to follow, and get out of that car KNOWING he was armed. Whether he was racist or not, white or black, fat or skinny, and so on has no bearing in what he did in my opinion. A kid who went to the store was killed because of his decision. If he stayed in the car and waited for the police, things would have been different (possibly, no telling if the racist cops in Sanford would have put bullets in Martin judging by their handling of the subsequent investigation).
 

emoney

custom user title
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
3,928
Reputation
100
Daps
2,305
Robbie3000, why would you refer to as a "Black-Hispanic" when that hasn't been confirmed yet. All media has said was that she was "Hispanic". The problem with Black people is they don't know who is and who IS NOT on their team and they set themselves up for disappointment. LOL @ any of you thinking this bytch was going to come through for Trayvon. She needs to STFU and go home
 

LionofJudah

Banned
Joined
Jun 12, 2013
Messages
6,372
Reputation
835
Daps
11,600
Reppin
NULL
abc_juror_b29_zimmerman_trial_ll_130725_16x9_992.jpg
 

El Bombi

Banned
Joined
Aug 31, 2012
Messages
53,517
Reputation
2,407
Daps
152,926
Reppin
NULL

Is this the bytch that could have hung the jury? Even if I felt the prosecution did a terrible job at proven their case. It's no way I could let Zimmerman walk free under my approval. I would have hung that shyt and allow that case to go back to trial.
 

blackzeus

Superstar
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
21,666
Reputation
2,825
Daps
43,536
LIke i said...no evidence of anything to point that Zimmerman's intent was to murder the guy. In her heart because she is biased like a lot of the posters here she felt Zimmerman had bad intentions but couldn't prove it and none of the evidence points to it and everything given went with Zimmerman's account or could not dispute Zimmerman's account. Which is the way the law works...if most of you are in the jury you would have done the same thing based on the law


I would have given 0 f*cks, but of course, they would have never put nikkaz on the jury. I would have been lookin' at GZ the whole time like :shaq:
 

Slystallion

Live to Strive
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
13,106
Reputation
-10,427
Daps
17,422
Only one side acted in the wrong. Whether or not you want to argue what the law says, that's another issue. But Zimmerman was told not to follow, and get out of that car KNOWING he was armed. Whether he was racist or not, white or black, fat or skinny, and so on has no bearing in what he did in my opinion. A kid who went to the store was killed because of his decision. If he stayed in the car and waited for the police, things would have been different (possibly, no telling if the racist cops in Sanford would have put bullets in Martin judging by their handling of the subsequent investigation).

And if Trayvon Martin doesn't throw a punch or the first strike and just keeps it moving he would be alive as well. If trayvon stops pummeling him when Zimmerman cries for help he would be alive as well. Sometimes we all make decisions that lead to terrible consequences and people have done much worse than Trayvon and don't have any repercussions ...Trayvon's tweets show he was thirsty for battle and blood sine he said he was mad he didn't make his last opponent bleed so for Trayvon it was a perfect opportunity to practice his new found mma skills but he wasn't in a controlled environment with a referee and the opponent had a weapon

Bad choices that didn't deserve death but always a risk when you attempt to hurt someone else
 

LionofJudah

Banned
Joined
Jun 12, 2013
Messages
6,372
Reputation
835
Daps
11,600
Reppin
NULL
Is this the bytch that could have hung the jury? Even if I felt the prosecution did a terrible job at proven their case. It's no way I could let Zimmerman walk free under my approval. I would have hung that shyt and allow that case to go back to trial.

That's her. Even if the state didn't try it again (because they don't have to), he wouldn't walk on my watch.
 

Slystallion

Live to Strive
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
13,106
Reputation
-10,427
Daps
17,422
Robbie3000, why would you refer to as a "Black-Hispanic" when that hasn't been confirmed yet. All media has said was that she was "Hispanic". The problem with Black people is they don't know who is and who IS NOT on their team and they set themselves up for disappointment. LOL @ any of you thinking this bytch was going to come through for Trayvon. She needs to STFU and go home

If zimmerman who looks like he could be the owner of a taco shop in Tijuana can be a white hispanic then why even care if she is described as a black hispanic lmao
 

Brown_Pride

All Star
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
6,416
Reputation
785
Daps
7,887
Reppin
Atheist for Jesus
LIke i said...no evidence of anything to point that Zimmerman's intent was to murder the guy. In her heart because she is biased like a lot of the posters here she felt Zimmerman had bad intentions but couldn't prove it and none of the evidence points to it and everything given went with Zimmerman's account or could not dispute Zimmerman's account. Which is the way the law works...if most of you are in the jury you would have done the same thing based on the law
intent to murder and murdering someone are not the same thing.
This brings up the point of "reasonable doubt". WTF does that mean?

TO ME, there were no "reasonable" doubts. There was some "unexplained" oddities, and "unconfirmed" story telling, but bottom line is ZIMMERMAN killed TRAYVON, we all know this. THAT is not up for debate, what is up for debate at that point is the stand your ground law...which was not brought up.

This case was approached backwards in a way. THey were trying to prove he killed trayvon. WE KNOW he killed him, but if he did so in self defense then THAT should have been proven, and it wasn't.

REASONABLY speaking, I DOUBT he acted in self defense, particularly when he was the aggressor.
 

Type Username Here

Not a new member
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
16,368
Reputation
2,385
Daps
32,643
Reppin
humans
And if Trayvon Martin doesn't throw a punch or the first strike and just keeps it moving he would be alive as well. If trayvon stops pummeling him when Zimmerman cries for help he would be alive as well.


How the hell do you know what? How do you know he wouldn't have shot him regardless? How do you know that he didn't instigate the situation to be able to commit murder?

You see, I KNOW that if Zimmerman followed the suggestions of the operator, Martin would have not been shot by him. It's on the phone. To me, that's the most damning part of the entire situation. If that call wasn't placed, I would be much more inclined to be more lenient, but that call was placed. We knew his intentions and his willing to escalate the situation. That cannot be argued.
 

emoney

custom user title
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
3,928
Reputation
100
Daps
2,305
If zimmerman who looks like he could be the owner of a taco shop in Tijuana can be a white hispanic then why even care if she is described as a black hispanic lmao

I don't care.... I was just curious why the threadstarter would describe as such when we don't know what she looks like.
 
Top