Black Guy secretly records encounter with police

[Tom Foolery]

If it wasn't on tape, they would deny the whole event even happened.

 

[el_oh_el]

If it wasn't on tape, they would deny the whole event even happened.

Of course. I wonder what's gon actually come of this tho. 2 weeks mandatory paid leave prolly

 

[OG_StankBrefs]

Nothing was unlawful under the constitution with that stop as far as i see, see Terry v. Ohio.... i don't know what the cops based their reasonable suspicion on to stop, (seemed like the cop was lying but he did say he came out of a known drug house at i least that what i think i heard)........ and that detainment seemed very long...

don't think he was arrested... so there was no injury under the law.....


Dude in the video was talking with him a bit too much..... don't help a bullshyt investigation brehs...


use our votes to strike down these unwarranted stop and frisk policies by some of these police departments in major cities

@ da whole post but especially da bolded.

 

[gangreen]

@ da whole post but especially da bolded.

wats ur problem with what i posted ..... it is all true..... the cop didn't do anything illegal as far as what i saw from the video, all the police need is reasonable suspicion to stop a suspect on the street and frisk him or her without probable cause. there must be reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime or has a reasonable belief that the person may be armed and presently dangerous.

the cop in the video articulated why he stopped him (something involving drugs or to that effect) which was probably bull shyt but i neither you don't know what happened before this. so the cop is going to get away with this.

My post was more about how the U.S. supreme court way back in the 1960s in a case called terry v. ohio have said that a stop like this is a constitutional exercise of police power. then in a case called Whren v. U.S..... the u.s. supreme court then implicitly allowed to racial profiling when they said any traffic violation by a driver was a sufficient reason for a stop, regardless of the officer's true intentions or motivations (even racial). With traffic laws as confusing as they are, this decision allows police to stop almost any driver and can subject him or her to a plain-view search at the whim of the police officer.

My post is about the unfairness of this since it has a disparate impact on minorities especially those of african and hispanic descent.

I said finally if you don't like it, the only way to stop it, was to use your voting power to let your state legislature know that you want to narrow stop and frisk policies to higher standard than just reasonable suspicion.

 

[porque]

same cop




also

NBC10 also learned several complaints were made against Nace throughout his career.

A source tells NBC10 Nace was accused of physical and verbal abuse during a stop in 2010. In 2011, another complainant accused Nace of verbal abuse. Earlier this year, a complainant accused Nace of planting drugs on him. Also this year, another complainant claimed Nace failed to provide proper help after he responded to a domestic violence call.

Internal Affairs is currently investigating Nace and his unidentified partner in relation to the two YouTube videos. Nace is still on the job but has been assigned to desk duty. His partner however is still patrolling the streets because officials say Nace’s actions are far more flagrant in the video.