It's so easy to make a male be quiet.
Black Feminist Explains Why She Dates White Men (Sound Logic?)
You spoke too soon sweetheart. So are you a 60% breed? "Check ya self, what percentage is you?"
I'm not your sweetheart, honeybuns.
Premeditated
MANDE KANG
sounds reasonable meBet.
Supermajority :a majority (as two-thirds or three-fifths) greater than a simple majority
supermajority | a majority (as two-thirds or three-fifths) greater than a simple majority
So according to you, anyone who is at least 66% qualifies as black. 2/3 breeds, like I said previously
You're whatever I decide to call you. Weak deflection by the way. Let's talk about your 60% criteria for being black because that's pretty interesting. Such a fine line between being a non black half breed and a black person. I wonder how you would propose building any kind of black love/unity/empowerment around such an arbitrary standard like that. I was at the march yesterday and I saw a lot lighter skinned folk who may or may not have made the cut(it was all love btw). Had the minister pushed that shyt you're talking I wonder how it would've played out.sounds reasonable me
As for the first statement, you can eat my ass. What could be more unifying than clearly defining what black is? No one is denigrating those with less than a supermajority of black DNA. They just aren't black. Something that even you believe as you'll commonly give these people their own separate categories (biracial, multigenerational admixed people, etc.). That's not something you would do if you didn't subconsciously view them as something other than black
Dmoneythegoat
Rookie
No I couldn't.
You're not clearly defining black though. You can't determine a person's genetic breakdown percentage wise just by looking at them. That's why it's a silly nonsensical standard.
That's a black man and his mother. Now looking at him, you wouldn't know that he doesn't meet your 60% standard.
You use terms like half-breed then claim you're not denigrating them. That's pretty dishonest. I'm AA but I wouldn't accept any term from Africans with no admixture that deemed me as less black or even worse not black at all just because I do have admixture. That would be an insult. That's exactly what you and people like you are doing. I take the term "black" for what it is. A general term referring to people who are visibly of African descent. Being mixed or having admixture and being black have never been mutually exclusive. Those aren't separate categories.
If that's his mother then he is biracial. No one needs to erase more than half of their identity to make you comfortable.No I couldn't.
You're not clearly defining black though. You can't determine a person's genetic breakdown percentage wise just by looking at them. That's why it's a silly nonsensical standard.
That's a black man and his mother. Now looking at him, you wouldn't know that he doesn't meet your 60% standard.
You use terms like half-breed then claim you're not denigrating them. That's pretty dishonest. I'm AA but I wouldn't accept any term from Africans with no admixture that deemed me as less black or even worse not black at all just because I do have admixture. That would be an insult. That's exactly what you and people like you are doing. I take the term "black" for what it is. A general term referring to people who are visibly of African descent. Being mixed or having admixture and being black have never been mutually exclusive. Those aren't separate categories.
When did black and biracial become mutually exclusive? A person being classified as black has never negated them from being biracial. That's what you refuse to understand. People like you refuse to accept what "black" means and has always meant in favor of what you want it to mean. You should learn to be strong minded enough to accept truths that you don't like.
at denying the man in be pic's blackness. This is why your side isn't to be taken seriously.
A biracial person is black AND other. You cannot remove the other (which is what you are trying to do) from their description. They are not black. They are not white. They are BOTH.
A person who's 60% is obviously 40% other too, yet you don't refer to them as mixed/biracial. Where's the consistency? Why do you ignore their other? They are both(at least) too right?
Red Shield
Global Domination
So judging by your stance, you only shop at black owned businesses, eat at black owned restaurants, wear black created clothes, and get your money from black men?You damn sure aren't having sex with white women for free. I know they take you desperate dudes for all you have a dinner here, some flowers there, cab rides, drinks ALL things that you have to buy from WHITE ESTABLISHMENTS. You think you're doing something by smutting white girls out when they'll just eventually go marry Brad anyway? The same Brad who by the way will be rich from all the money that you circulated into his community under the guise of getting back at him by nutting in Stacie.
Tell me, what do you own, control, and can pass down?
What assets do you have?
You surely talking a lot of shyt for bytch who cannot list NOT ONE asset you can control, own, and pass down to your children. What are you building with your black man that you can own, control, and pass down? Oh thats right, you're just another bitter, broke bytch who don't have shyt, have no passive income, work a dead end job, and doesn't have a man.
You spend your days behind a keyboard bytching about black men this, black man that instead of investing your energy building something that you trying to accuse ME of not doing.
That doesn't stop YOU from not building, you would have every excuse not to build, but can think of a million ways to come at black men, FOH wench.
Nah, just white women.
That really makes you feel a certain way but you would date a fat sloppy wm and create a thread dreaming men you CANNOT have.