BlackAdam
Pro
because we don't like laws to be made on a false premise makes atheism more than just a disbelief in a god?Then atheism is more then just the belief that god is not real. If you can make such claims.
because we don't like laws to be made on a false premise makes atheism more than just a disbelief in a god?Then atheism is more then just the belief that god is not real. If you can make such claims.
because we don't like laws to be made on a false premise makes atheism more than just a disbelief in a god?
when it comes to a law being passed based on a religious belief, call me crazy, but i'm pretty sure it's not weird to believe a non religious person would not agree with it or be ok with a law that forces a religious belief on us.No the fact that you can say what someone agrees with just based on the fact that they don't think god exist.
that's called a theory and based on chains of chemical and gas, has been proven can happen. for all we know, we're just one of many universes and this one was spawned from another. the thing about being scientific is you can theorize, but what you religious folks are doing are basically saying you know the truth based on an ancient book with no fukking facts or eyewitness accounts other than the men that wrote the book. I mean really?You believe an entire universe came about from nothing. Then claim to represent science when that goes against everything else science teaches.
You're confused, breh. Devoid of knowledge, understanding and guidance.
that's called a theory and based on chains of chemical and gas, has been proven can happen. for all we know, we're just one of many universes and this one was spawned from another. the thing about being scientific is you can theorize, but what you religious folks are doing are basically saying you know the truth based on an ancient book with no fukking facts or eyewitness accounts other than the men that wrote the book. I mean really?
I'd rather say "I don't know" than some invisible being in the sky you've never seen is manipulating the universe based off a book men wrote thousands of years ago when witches, giants and superstition was prevalent.
see edit. and are you asking me something as simple as how did life begin while claiming you're scientific? if you're scientific you already know the answer to that.The thing about being religious is you can be religious and scientific.
You lack an answer to the most important question of all: How did life begin?
Your middle and end are invalid with no beginning. Keep studying. Try, try and try again.
see edit. and are you asking me something as simple as how did life begin while claiming you're scientific? if you're scientific you already know the answer to that.
being scientific AND religious is an oxymoron, perhaps you mean spiritual.
and we all came from 1 man, and 1 woman, 5,000 years ago? We've already debunked that with fossils and DNA findings, I dont know how clear cut we have to get with science to debunk such silly things.
asking how the universe came into existence is like asking how god came into existence. however, we've been able to mimic the components of how life begin using gas and molecules which lead to the compounds of basic life.Perhaps you don't know enough about world religions and you're generalizing based on your own experiences? IDK why you would say something that silly.
The scientific method was developed by a Muslim. So wouldn't that make pretty much all science oxymoronic?
And yes, I'm asking you how life began. What causes life? How did the universe come into existence? You've already shown limited understanding. But please continue. I would love to hear you explain that.
asking how the universe came into existence is like asking how god came into existence. however, we've been able to mimic the components of how life begin using gas and molecules which lead to the compounds of basic life.
Muslims created technology, but they were no where near as advanced as we are now. astronomy and algebra, doesn't clash with religious beliefs like they do today. quite simple.
So people who lived centuries ago weren't as technologically advanced as we are today? This shyt is groundbreaking, b.
Also, I find it funny how "we" have been able to mimic, as you say, but "nothing" was able to do sooo much more. So if you're less than nothing, why should I listen to anything you say?