This the one
This isn’t very fair. You can cook any of the numbers to make whatever point you are trying to make.
It’s all about timing, and pretty much nobody can get that timing exactly right.
BTC has been a huge money maker for some and a huge loss for others.
That’s kinda how all this stuff works. Somebody gotta take a loss for someone else to make a gain.
It’s all a “scam” or “ponzi scheme” when you look at it that way.
The goal is to come out on the right side of the fukkery
As has everything else.No it's a very fair retort to people who like pointing out how low Bitcoin was in 2011-2013. The vast majority of investors didn't get in at nearly that low.
The correct statement would be "BTC has been a huge money maker for very few and a huge loss for many more".
As has everything else.
Lots of “tesla millionaires” and lots of tesla “bagolders”
Like i said, somebody gotta lose for somebody to win.
You can pick a time and a particular number and make pretty much any claim you wanna make
No, it's a very fair retort to people who like pointing out how low Bitcoin was in 2011-2013 in response to recent declines, with the undertone that past returns will be replicated in the future. The vast majority of investors didn't get in at those very early lows. The correct statement would be "BTC has been a huge money maker for very very very few and a huge loss for many more".
Completely clueless about how all of this stuff works
…and fools said this shyt was an inflation hedge
Don’t feel bad, pretty much everybody else is too.
Bag holders outweigh millionaires every where. That’s kinda how it works.The difference is the bagholders exponentially outweigh the millionaires in crypto. So using your logic of somebody gotta lose for somebody to win, Madoff's Ponzi was all good right?