Floyd Mayweather has way more fights than any UFC fighter in the history of the sport, how are you making a point with this ?
He's got 11 finishes, not 15 so that's 50% finishes which is pretty close to Mayweather's finish %age too
Every weight class's top 10 is full of talent bruh what are you saying ? The UFC rankings are definitely arguable when it comes to certain fighters, but the lack of talent isn't the reason for that at all.
Ok Eroll Spence is 20 and 0 and has 17 KO's, Floyd had the same amount of KO's when he was 20-0 he stopped getting KO's when he go old and moved up to higher rates. Most boxing fights end in KO, that's my point. Only when two elite fighters fight it's hard to score a KO in boxing. Instead of arguing with me, why don't you check the guy spewing bullshyt.
Nate Diaz has 15 finishes, he broke Anderson Silva's record against Mcgregor, another example of mma fans not knowing any facts about the sport they claim they support.the percentage doesn't matter I wasn't comparing him to Mayweather, I was comparing the fact they claim he doesn't knock anyone out. Also Nate Diaz is just the exception he's not the norm in MMA, most MMA fighters do not finishes fights look at their records. They go on a streak and then they always tapper off with the stoppages. So the claim is just bogus.
Every weight class's top 10 is not filled with talent, you are crazy. Arloski is ranked 7th at heavyweight lmao. Outside of Weidman, Rockhold, and Romero, there's nobody at middleweight, and their all their 30's.
MMA never had deep talent, that's why it's so easy to clean out divisions.
Only division that was stacked was light heavyweight and jon jones has depleted that division to the point it's like the others.
UFC should've stayed in tournament format like how it started, but they had to copy boxing and it doesn't work with MMA.
