Bill Simmons goes in on the Hitman

Henzo

Kliq'd Up
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
7,263
Reputation
771
Daps
11,594
http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/9594200/the-summer-no-mailbag

Q: Did I just hear on your podcast that you were "never a fan of" Bret Hart? As a lifelong follower of the best there is, the best there was, and the best there ever will be, I'd appreciate an explanation.
—Dennis, Philadelphia

SG: Let's see … no personality, no sense of humor, wet hair, horrible entrance music, hideous wrestling outfit (pink and black?), never tweaked his gimmick, didn't get along with Shawn Michaels, "carried" the WWE during its most boring stretch of the past 40 years, sold out for WCW money, remains memorable only because of (a) the Montreal Screwjob (and the fact that he punched Vince McMahon afterward), and (b) his phenomenal Ewing Theory credentials (the WWE took off again right after he left). Just thought he was overrated.

Quick tangent: In our aforementioned podcast last week, Wesley Morris mentioned his "market corrections" theory and how, sometimes, there can be only one "type" of successful lane for one actor (only with multiple actors vying for it). An example he liked: Mark Harmon never making it as a leading movie actor because Kevin Costner took all of those marquee roles that could have gone to Harmon from 1988 through 1995. Costner was Harmon's market-correction guy, the guy blocking Harmon from having a Costner-like career.

Same for Tom Hanks and Michael Keaton — they battled for seven years for "funny/likable comic actor who dabbles in serious roles and will eventually become an A-lister" supremacy, with Keaton gaining an early A-list upper hand in 1989 thanks to the Batman movies. What happened to Hanks? Total tailspin! That was his Joe Versus the Volcano/Bonfire of the Vanities stretch — three years of forgettable movies. When Hanks rallied back in 1992 with A League of Their Own, then Sleepless in Seattle,Philadelphia (Oscar) and Forrest Gump (Oscar), what happened to Keaton? TAILSPIN! As Wesley says, there could be only one.

Back to Bret Hart: His market-correction guy was "Mr. Perfect," Curt Hennig, another technically terrific wrestler who hit the WWE in the mid-1980s. I always loved the arrogant "Mr. Perfect" gimmick and thought Hennig was more interesting and entertaining than Hart, but Hart's extended wrestling family (brother Owen, brothers-in-law Jim Neidhart and British Bulldog) morphed into the Hart Foundation family, which stole good spots in every pay-per-view. With the Hitman leading the way, of course. So Hennig ended up being the Keaton to Hitman's Hanks — he never won the WWE title and eventually jumped to WCW. So not only did Bret Hart semi-bore the hell out of us in dozens of pay-per-views, he drove away his more entertaining market-correction guy. I don't hate him for it. Just can't call myself a Hitman fan. Wait, did we just spend four paragraphs on this?

Bill's a Kliqster :rambo:
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
70,180
Reputation
11,678
Daps
246,039
Reppin
206 & 734
83663393.jpg
>>>>>>>>>>>>
Bret+Hart+%252816%2529.jpg


:ufdup: he shoulda been Evolution'd up

bret+hart+batista+wwe+raw+2010.jpg

 

MushroomX

Packers Stockholder
Supporter
Joined
Aug 17, 2013
Messages
27,646
Reputation
9,299
Daps
116,731
Reppin
Wisconsin
If Bill wants to be Evolution'd up, he has to turn heel and leave Boston, denouncing all Sports because of Cena connections.
He has to move south of the Connecticut Blueblood line.
 

dh86

Superstar
Joined
Jun 4, 2013
Messages
23,914
Reputation
950
Daps
54,022
Reppin
Detroit
WWF turned around because of the USA vs Canada fued. Stone Cold taking off moved along because of the fued. Him being a main eventer in the first place, was because of Bret Hart. He was on top for 5 years, he wouldn't have been ever forgotten. He was a bigger star than Sting and people want him in WWE today
 

TrueEpic08

Dum Shiny
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
10,035
Reputation
931
Daps
17,194
Reppin
SoCal State Beaches
That stupid "market correction" theory is pure horseshyt (Simmons coming up with a horseshyt theory? Who would've guessed...). The reason that Perfect didn't end up on top was because he was given a chance (far before Bret was, in fact) and bombed horribly on a house show loop against Hogan. Add in the injuries and the main event just wasn't going to happen for Hennig.

Like it or not, Bret was the most over guy for the WWF during his era (1992-1996 or 1997). He was the guy who drew the most on top, who got the biggest reactions, and who deserved to carry the belt. These aren't the opinions of some know nothing, these can be backed up by any number of and any types of sources from that time period. To say that he kept Hennig from doing something he got the chance to do three years before Bret did is preposterous, especially when he 1. Failed business-wise in that opportunity and 2. Had injuries that would have precluded him from getting another opportunity anyway. They were never in any type of competition and the fact that Simmons thinks that they were speaks to the paucity of his knowledge regarding wrestling (...is this why some in The Coliseum get so mad at him?).

Don't get me started on the "sold out for more money" allegation. Breach of contract means nothing to him, I suppose.

And if I were Bret, I wouldn't have gotten along with Shawn Michaels in 1997 either. As a matter of fact, a number of Michaels' own fans on this board probably would have hated him in 1997. But I suppose that schadenfreude is a powerful concept...
 
Top