So other nations are better off under the wings of amerikkka huh
Amerikkka is the largest terrorist organization in the world, no wonder it is known as the evil empire
Biden authorizes Ukraine to use US long range missiles for deeper strikes inside Russia
- Thread starter 3rdWorld
- Start date
Amerikkka is the largest terrorist organization in the world, no wonder it is known as the evil empire
Nkrumah Was Right
Superstar
I am not “pro Russia”.
You, as a black man, cannot afford to think in such simple dichotomies. It’s not helpful to us.
Kyle C. Barker
Migos VERZUZ Mahalia Jackson
I am not “pro Russia”.
You, as a black man, cannot afford to think in such simple dichotomies. It’s not helpful to us.
Who is "US" ?
Your college buddies stuck in Ukraine? Once Putin ends the invasion they can go back to class (if the university hasn't been turned to rubble yet of course)
Nkrumah Was Right
Superstar
I thought you were black?
You're really that jumped up because Slavs are murdering each other in the Donbas?
Are you Ukrainian?
Dwayne_Taylor
Superstar
I just leared today that Zelenskyy used to be an actor and was in a Jean-Claude Van Damme movie
Look up his videos he’s a clownI just leared today that Zelenskyy used to be an actor and was in a Jean-Claude Van Damme movie
JamesJabdi
Superstar
Putin and Biden grew up in the cold war and were in their prime at that time.....these ol cacs fukking shyt up because they bout to die.
Ukraine: Fury in Russia at missile move but Putin so far silent
What really counts is what President Putin does next, writes the BBC's Steve Rosenberg.
www.bbc.com
Fury in Russia at 'serious escalation' of missile move
10 hours ago
=Steve Rosenberg
Russia editor, BBC News•@BBCSteveR
Reporting fromMoscow
Putin previously said Moscow would view the move as "direct participation" of Nato countries in the Ukraine war
President Biden’s decision to allow Ukraine to strike inside Russia with long-range missiles supplied by the US has sparked a furious response in Russia.
"Departing US president Joe Biden… has taken one of the most provocative, uncalculated decisions of his administration, which risks catastrophic consequences," declared the website of the Russian government newspaper Rossiyskaya Gazeta on Monday morning.
Russian MP Leonid Slutsky, head of the pro-Kremlin Liberal-Democratic Party, predicted that the decision would "inevitably lead to a serious escalation, threatening serious consequences".
Russian senator Vladimir Dzhabarov called it "an unprecedented step towards World War Three".
Anger, yes. But no real surprise.
Komsomolskaya Pravda, the pro-Kremlin tabloid, called it "a predictable escalation".
What really counts, though, is what Vladimir Putin calls it and how the Kremlin leader responds.
So far he’s stayed silent.
But on Monday President Putin’s spokesman Dmitry Peskov told journalists that “if such a decision has been taken it means a whole new spiral of tension and a whole new situation with regard to US involvement in this conflict".
Mr Peskov accused the Biden administration of “adding fuel to the fire and continuing to stoke tension around this conflict".
Western leaders would argue that it’s Russia that is ‘adding the fuel’ by recently deploying North Korean troops to the war zone to fight alongside Russian forces and by continuing to attack Ukraine.
President Putin himself may have yet to comment. But Russia’s president has said plenty before.
In recent months, the Kremlin has made its message to the West crystal clear: do not do this, do not remove restrictions on the use of your long-range weapons, do not allow Kyiv to strike deep into Russian territory with these missiles.
In September President Putin warned that if this were allowed to happen, Moscow would view it as the "direct participation" of Nato countries in the Ukraine war.
"This would mean that Nato countries… are fighting with Russia," he continued.
The following month, the Kremlin leader announced imminent changes to the Russian nuclear doctrine, the document setting out the preconditions under which Moscow might decide to use a nuclear weapon.
This was widely interpreted as another less-than-subtle hint to America and Europe not to allow Ukraine to strike Russian territory with long-range missiles.
Guessing Vladimir Putin’s next moves is never easy.
But he has dropped hints.
Back in June, at a meeting with the heads of international news agencies, Putin was asked: how would Russia react if Ukraine was given the opportunity to hit targets on Russian territory with weapons supplied by Europe?
"First, we will, of course, improve our air defence systems. We will be destroying their missiles," President Putin replied.
"Second, we believe that if someone is thinking it is possible to supply such weapons to a war zone to strike our territory and create problems for us, why can’t we supply our weapons of the same class to those regions around the world where they will target sensitive facilities of the countries that are doing this to Russia?"
In other words, arming Western adversaries to strike Western targets abroad is something Moscow has been considering.
President Biden has given Ukraine permission to use ATACMS missiles, seen here during South Korea-US military exercises, to strike inside Russia
In my recent interview with Alexander Lukashenko, the leader of Belarus, Putin's close ally seemed to confirm the Kremlin has been thinking along these lines.
Mr Lukashenko told me he had discussed the subject at a recent meeting with Western officials.
"I warned them. 'Guys, be careful with those long-range missiles,'" Mr Lukashenko told me.
"The Houthi [rebels] might come to Putin and ask for coastal weapons systems that can carry out terrifying strikes on ships.
"And if he gets his revenge on you for supplying long-range weapons to [President] Zelensky by supplying the Houthis with the Bastion missile system? What happens if an aircraft carrier is hit? A British or American one. What then?"
But some of the media reaction in Russia appeared designed to play things down.
"The Russian armed forces had already [previously] intercepted ATACMS missiles during attacks on the Crimean shore," a military expert told the Izvestia newspaper, which went on to suggest that President-elect Trump might "revise" the decision.
This is, to put it mildly, an unusual situation.
In two months’ time, President Biden will be out of office and Donald Trump will be in the White House.
The Kremlin knows that President-elect Trump has been far more sceptical than President Biden about military assistance for Ukraine.
Will that be a factor in Vladimir Putin’s calculations as he formulates Russia’s response?
who defied putin when most lifelong civil servants would have fled and capitulated.
legend.
Smoke fest.
Roger king
Superstar
Biden has a few months in office, the best thing he can do is helping ukraine stop further russian aggression and for self defense. I remind folks russia invaded their country and slaughtered thousands of their citizens in cold blood, putin is a pure fascist and a racist and wants the russian empire to rule the world not the us, its imperative especially with trump about to take power every effort to help ukraine be put into policy
Nkrumah Was Right
Superstar
same person defying big bad putin and got him travelling on trains cause flying is risking, body doubles, punked into demolishing his own home to prevent zelensky from getting media attention from blowing it up, fukking up his oil refineries and state income etc.
Nkrumah Was Right
Superstar
Is Ukraine winning?
C’mon - yes or no?
Major Western publications, military analysts, and other institutions say that Ukraine is losing and Russia is capturing several towns each week.
Why support a losing war?
UWasntThere
Superstar
Israel is our proxy and they apparently don't need permission to do anythingthey're our proxy to fight russia
