I didn't say you did. You are missing the point. You seem to be arguing (correct me if I'm wrong) - that anyone who wasn't commercially successful cannot be considered as the best rapper of any given year. I'm arguing, what about the people who aren't impressed by the new jacks and think the old rappers are putting out the best product? Are we supposed to pick Drake just b/c he had songs that we didn't like played all over the radio?
Obviously, commercial success is not synonymous with quality music. I'm sure you agree with that.
Name albums over the last decade that were similarly underground to Linx 2 but did all of these things.
You are setting up criteria that is going to minimize rappers who are underground.
Can't a rapper just have the best album anymore? Is it necessary that its pushed by the machine?
Only Built 4 Cuban Linx… Pt. II was released on September 8, 2009 and was ranked the number one downloaded album available on
iTunes for the first three days of its release.
[37] It debuted at number 4 on the
Billboard 200 and at number 2 on the
Top R&B/Hip-Hop Albums chart, the same positioning as the original
Only Built 4 Cuban Linx..., while selling near 68,000 copies in its first week.
[38] Only Built 4 Cuban Linx… Pt. II has sold 132,000 copies in the United States as of November 12, 2009, according to
SoundScan.
[39]
Obviously people were playing it.
Popularity matters much much more to you than it does to me.
I would think so since he had been dead for three years at that point
Album was a big deal and long awaited in 2013. He didn't have a smash single or nothing like that...but I don't see why that disqualifies him as the best rapper.
There were no 40 year old rappers in the 80s and 90s breh
So this doesn't mean anything.
Hip hop is aging...this sort of internal conflict was inevitable.