Like Terell jacobs said, the mane is a benefactor.
If three tigers cant get pass the mane of a lion who isnt even fighting back, I think a crazed lion offering resistance will have the tiger find it almost impossible to get to the neck.
Is this all you ever post about?
The Tiger often wins. The lion does occasionally win these battles, but rarely. It would not be hands down either of them (who could make such a claim?), but all evidence seems to support that the Tiger is the one most likely to win, not the Lion. It makes no difference if this is a captive tiger and lion or wild tigers and lions. When both are captive, they both suffer and benefit from the exact same social pressures. A captive lion might not be able to practice with his brothers, but a captive tiger can’t practice hunting and taking down game either. They both have an equal handicap in captivity, and yet the Tiger almost always wins. This would not significantly affect the outcome.
A stronger, faster, fiercer opponent is a stronger, faster, fiercer opponent no matter if they are both in a zoo or both in the wild. Romans would trap and fight wild tigers and lions together and the lion rarely won. Here’s some video below to sum up the answer with more than just conjecture ... Just watch both animals and you tell me, who is the more fierce fighter?
The funny thing is..you pasted another YouTube video with anecdotal "facts", so I guess we are even.
Here's the most thorough paper you will find on this topic, loaded with citations.
Tiger vs Lion Documented Fights | . Informed . Opinions .
Tiger >>>>>>> Lion, sorry brah.
If a leopard can kill a tiger, a jaguar could as well.