No they didn't because Portugal had exclusive and first dibs on the region, and during that time is was fierce competition and they weren't swapping like that, but yes you can get back on topicI actually remember saying the WHOLE diaspora. Which includes Latin America and the Caribbean. And yes while most AA's don't have Bantu ancestry, some do. And if you look at it in a historical aspect, the earliest slaves in the USA were Bantu. But English/American slavers stopped bringing slaves from Bantu areas after Bantu's kept rebelling.
Now can we get back on topic?
6,000 - do you know how many slaves got to north america compared to 6,000?Which means nothing since migration exist. The region in 1600 isn't the same as it was in 1800.
http://slavenorth.com/newyork.htm
We can agree-disagree Indeed lets get back on topic.No they didn't because Portugal had exclusive and first dibs on the region, and during that time is was fierce competition and they weren't swapping like that, but yes you can get back on topic
Stop acting like woman - just pull out your note pad and learn some shyt like a good little boy.Yo @Clean Cut gtfo ur derailing the thread with ur non sensical bullshyt
Read my first post. I said most, not all. And this is common knowledge via DNA test. You can find this information online easily. The major is Mande, not Bantu, despite popular belief.AAs can't be monolithic when talking ancestry and West Africa is more than Mande people.
@KidStranglehold Get this punk azz nikka out yo thread bruh he done messed it up
We looking at beautiful women then this chump wanna come in and start shyt
Botswana:
Congo:
this guy.These women are pretty but they could stand to cover up juuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuhst a little bit. A teensy weensie tad there friends.