Interesting points brought up. I didn't know much about the case and what evidence they had but this is eye-opening.
So pigs are supposed to be above the law?
When someone is charged with murder EVERYONE who was "with" them is an accomplice. They all get charged. That is the norm. So they can do that to civilians, but when they do it to pigs they're reaching and its unconstitutional?
Baltimore has grandjuries. The charges are bullshyt? Yet a whole jury of people decided they had enough evidence to indict these cops right? How does that work?
Highly doubt these pigs get off in BALTIMORE. They'll be judged by a jury of their peers. Know what that means in BALTIMORE? A whole lotta BLACK PEOPLE.
Lol. We'll see how shyt turns out.
the ones who are found not guilty, i see no reason they wouldnt get their jobs back, however it would be unlikely for them to want to keep them as they would be targetsIf the cops get off do they get their jobs back?
And prosecutors might have to go for lesser charges in these cases. Seems like juries will not put these cops in prison for murder or manslaughter no matter the circumstances.
the ones who are found not guilty, i see no reason they wouldnt get their jobs back, however it would be unlikely for them to want to keep them as they would be targets
So pigs are supposed to be above the law?
When someone is charged with murder EVERYONE who was "with" them is an accomplice. They all get charged. That is the norm. So they can do that to civilians, but when they do it to pigs they're reaching and its unconstitutional?
Baltimore has grandjuries. The charges are bullshyt? Yet a whole jury of people decided they had enough evidence to indict these cops right? How does that work?
Highly doubt these pigs get off in BALTIMORE. They'll be judged by a jury of their peers. Know what that means in BALTIMORE? A whole lotta BLACK PEOPLE.
Lol. We'll see how shyt turns out.
Targets for what? No one would do anything to them.
Damn you and op ethered my whole post.The standard required to indict someone (Probable Cause) is even lower than the standard required to win a civil case (Preponderance of Evidence) and the same standard as required to arrest someone. An indictment doesn't necessarily rise to the level of beyond a reasonable doubt, breh. And if the Prosecution really has nothing to show (it's not looking like they have much) there might be a Directed Verdict (where the Judge takes the judgement out of the hands of the jury). An indictment by itself doesn't really mean much, breh
Damn you and op ethered my whole post.
it's not just the knife tho bruh, there is literally no case for murder, and a very weak one for manlsaughter watch the video
Second-degree murder is ordinarily defined as: 1) an intentional killing that is not premeditated or planned, nor committed in a reasonable "heat of passion"; or 2) a killing caused by dangerous conduct and the offender's obvious lack of concern for human life. Second-degree murder may best be viewed as the middle ground between first-degree murder and voluntary manslaughter