You're missing the point then. The advances we've gained in this country, in this society, were not solely the results of our own efforts. Admittedly I fall into the mentality from time to time that violence or money can be the only exclusive game changers when it comes to affecting positive change for us in society. However, that's short sighted when you take into account any positive change for Blacks or any group in this country for that matter in a historical sense. We both needed and benefited from the sympathies and actions of non-Blacks (yep, that means cacs) to make significant gains. That said, by default, there is going to be some concern with how we represent ourselves. Matter fact, to put it into perspective, plenty of people both on here and otherwise were upset with how the media represented the past week's actions. How so? Folks took exception to use of the words, "riot", and, "thugs." In other words, people were concerned about being misrepresented in a negative manner for a couple of reasons. One, it invalidates the legitimate range of emotions young Blacks are reeling from. Two, it invalidates their actions as not being civil, so why even bother understanding their grievances. Three, it's hypocritical to label them thugs and call it a riot when we see young whites get involved with similar to the same behavior and they're never labeled with negative terms.
That said, like it or not, our appearances as in both how the media represents us and how we represent ourselves will be a component that will shape to some degree the public discourse on subjects like police brutality and the Black community. In a perfect world, right is right, and wrong is wrong, but life is far more complex than that.