Baltimore man Freddie Gray dies after getiing neck broken while in police custody

↓R↑LYB

I trained Sheng Long and Shonuff
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
44,204
Reputation
13,769
Daps
171,175
Reppin
Pawgistan
bytch please, u wanted to shack up with Asian men, why dont u join a Asian board with your flat-ass...dont be part time wench. We only need real, full time negroes here, if u share ur bed with someone other then blsck then u cant speak on the community since you are not a part of it. FOH.

:dead:
 

GoldenGlove

😐😑😶😑😐
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
59,633
Reputation
5,750
Daps
140,452
Honestly we need to do the same shyt everyone else is doing. Get our money up and buy a polotiican and get them to pass a national police brutality act that says there needs to be cameras, if they turn it off there's a mandatory felony, and there has to be a community based group who's responsible for over site and is able to determine if charges need to be filed. They gays raised money and got don't ask don't tell repealed and Hispanics raised money and got the dream act to DC, so there's nothing stopping us from doing the same.
There needs to be a law for bullets used on unarmed people or some shyt.

Every round fired on an unarmed man needs to have some steep ass price on it. Cops out here emptying their clips on brothers when they don't even have a weapon on them.
:what:
 

↓R↑LYB

I trained Sheng Long and Shonuff
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
44,204
Reputation
13,769
Daps
171,175
Reppin
Pawgistan
There needs to be a law for bullets used on unarmed people or some shyt.

Every round fired on an unarmed man needs to have some steep ass price on it. Cops out here emptying their clips on brothers when they don't even have a weapon on them.
:what:

Exactly. You shoot an unarmed civilian, you get 5 years per bullet fired and 10 years for each bullet that hit him.

I wonder what it would take to get that type of shyt turned into a law :patrice:
 

Eye Cue DA COLI GAWD

<--- Cleveland Browns winning that many, boi!
Joined
Jul 28, 2012
Messages
15,695
Reputation
-8,541
Daps
42,867
You're missing the point then. The advances we've gained in this country, in this society, were not solely the results of our own efforts. Admittedly I fall into the mentality from time to time that violence or money can be the only exclusive game changers when it comes to affecting positive change for us in society. However, that's short sighted when you take into account any positive change for Blacks or any group in this country for that matter in a historical sense. We both needed and benefited from the sympathies and actions of non-Blacks (yep, that means cacs) to make significant gains. That said, by default, there is going to be some concern with how we represent ourselves. Matter fact, to put it into perspective, plenty of people both on here and otherwise were upset with how the media represented the past week's actions. How so? Folks took exception to use of the words, "riot", and, "thugs." In other words, people were concerned about being misrepresented in a negative manner for a couple of reasons. One, it invalidates the legitimate range of emotions young Blacks are reeling from. Two, it invalidates their actions as not being civil, so why even bother understanding their grievances. Three, it's hypocritical to label them thugs and call it a riot when we see young whites get involved with similar to the same behavior and they're never labeled with negative terms.

That said, like it or not, our appearances as in both how the media represents us and how we represent ourselves will be a component that will shape to some degree the public discourse on subjects like police brutality and the Black community. In a perfect world, right is right, and wrong is wrong, but life is far more complex than that.
How someone chooses to see me is a choice on their behalf.

I don't get paid to convince someone to see me for something I'm not.

Take your head out the sand.
 

Benjamin Sisko

Still that resident truth-bringer
Supporter
Joined
May 29, 2013
Messages
23,572
Reputation
5,565
Daps
90,295
Reppin
NO
I am not going to derail this importat thread because of your insecurities...to ignore you go and stay :umad:

You don't know me and eat a dikk
Then stfu about what black men are doing wench, because i will call you out when u slip. Now what? :fitzumad:
 

Sierra Mist

Banned
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
21,624
Reputation
-334
Daps
23,059
doubt it too many adults around there got the ray ray mindset... it'll take more than teenagers.
Nah this is different though because of the past not guilty verdicts that rocked us. I think everyone's just had enough at this point. This has to be "the one". The emotional psychology behind constant mis-justice will cause even the calmest to start spazzing.

The sister looks like she plays no games though so that's a plus.
 

IGSaint12

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
14,455
Reputation
2,350
Daps
39,410
Reppin
NULL
You're missing the point then. The advances we've gained in this country, in this society, were not solely the results of our own efforts. Admittedly I fall into the mentality from time to time that violence or money can be the only exclusive game changers when it comes to affecting positive change for us in society. However, that's short sighted when you take into account any positive change for Blacks or any group in this country for that matter in a historical sense. We both needed and benefited from the sympathies and actions of non-Blacks (yep, that means cacs) to make significant gains. That said, by default, there is going to be some concern with how we represent ourselves. Matter fact, to put it into perspective, plenty of people both on here and otherwise were upset with how the media represented the past week's actions. How so? Folks took exception to use of the words, "riot", and, "thugs." In other words, people were concerned about being misrepresented in a negative manner for a couple of reasons. One, it invalidates the legitimate range of emotions young Blacks are reeling from. Two, it invalidates their actions as not being civil, so why even bother understanding their grievances. Three, it's hypocritical to label them thugs and call it a riot when we see young whites get involved with similar to the same behavior and they're never labeled with negative terms.

That said, like it or not, our appearances as in both how the media represents us and how we represent ourselves will be a component that will shape to some degree the public discourse on subjects like police brutality and the Black community. In a perfect world, right is right, and wrong is wrong, but life is far more complex than that.


I do agree that how we are perceived by the media does matter in some senses like you said how the word thug gets thrown around at black people vs white people. However I disagree with your sentiment in the above post that the riots were embarrassing. The riots weren't embarrassing because they brought out change by getting these charges on police officers. The news media and government officials weren't listening when the black people in baltimore were doing peaceful protesting. As Danielle Williams said on the ground of baltimore when they were doing peaceful protests,
“When we were out here protesting all last week for six days straight peacefully, there were no news cameras, there were no helicopters, there was no riot gear, and nobody heard us. So now that we’ve burned down buildings and set businesses on fire and looted buildings, now all of the sudden everybody wants to hear us.”

Their voices weren't being heard and nothing was being done. At that point, appearance does not matter and sometimes violent force is necessary to bring attention to the unheard voices. You can't just be worried about how you are perceived to the point of immobility. The riots forced america and the news media to pay attention even if it did bring the negative opinions that painted protestors with a broad brush. It was a necessary evil because it brought about change.
 
Top