Ballers Wanna Ball, Rollers Wanna Roll, But We're Taking All--The Official 2017-2018 Lakers Thread

Mic-Nificent

I didn't eat nobody
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
10,380
Reputation
650
Daps
18,986
Reppin
NULL
Unless D'Lo became an All Star next year Magic was going to get rid of him anyway. It was never a question about D'lo's talent, Magic thought D'Lo was immature an lazy. He met with the kid multiple times, tried to mentor him, warned him repeatedly, and the behavior didn't change quickly enough for Magic's liking.

The fact that Lonzo is on deck and Ingram is seen as a superstar in waiting made D'Angelo even more expendable. Problem is his trade value was incredibly low, and it wasn't just because of his play, that shyt with Nick Young had more of an impact than people are willing to admit.
 

H.J.Duck

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
4,912
Reputation
880
Daps
13,216
And if he falls off this year, his value decreases as well.

Is there any any real reasons other than serious injury why this would happen?

And if that's the case we might as well trade all our young players right now because there's a chance they might fall off or get hurt. As a matter of fact, why even try if there's a chance someone doesnt develop or falls off
 

MustafaSTL

Achievement In Every Field of Human Endeavor
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
16,684
Reputation
3,976
Daps
49,356
Is there any any real reasons other than serious injury why this would happen?

And if that's the case we might as well trade all our young players right now because there's a chance they might fall off or get hurt. As a matter of fact, why even try if there's a chance someone doesnt develop of falls off
Scroll up. My original post was that if they decided to trade him and no longer wanted to have him on the squad, and the response they got from teams was that they could not even get a lottery pick for him, and a late first was the best they could do, then why do they have to wait. He responded by saying Russ could get better and his value could increase, and my response is that it could decrease as well. So all that other stuff you said doesn't really relate to my original point.
 

I AM WARHOL

Veteran
Joined
Feb 17, 2014
Messages
29,507
Reputation
5,066
Daps
121,311
Reppin
ATL
His first and second year numbers are basically identical besides an extra 1.5 assists. That's a plateau, not an upwards trend.
Let's be 100. You're hate of D'lo has nothing to do with basketball and i respect that. Out of all the D'lo haters I respect you the most because your consistent and it's all apart of the overarching OSU Michigan beef:ehh:. But trying to use the numbers to justify trading D'lo isn't gonna work:yeshrug:. For his age, position, and minutes on court, he was an above average prospect by any stat or metric. Maybe not a superstar but he was no bust
 

Reid2Achieve

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
6,035
Reputation
660
Daps
13,233
Reppin
Atlanta
Let's be 100. You're hate of D'lo has nothing to do with basketball and i respect that. Out of all the D'lo haters I respect you the most because your consistent and it's all apart of the overarching OSU Michigan beef:ehh:. But trying to use the numbers to justify trading D'lo isn't gonna work:yeshrug:. For his age, position, and minutes on court, he was an above average prospect by any stat or metric. Maybe not a superstar but he was no bust
Agreed. @Regular_P wants to use numbers now and cite minor knee injuries. Well we could use Ingram as an example of a player who was objectively bad in his rookie year. There is little to no precedent for a player who's stats were as bad as his rookie season stats were to turn in to a star. Not to mention he has already missed games for knee issues as well. But he's untouchable... and I don't disagree.

But half of the fan base and half of the organization seemingly never liked Russell for intangible reasons like he is "aloof" or "immature" - or because he wasn't Okafor. That's pretty much the organization's only justification. It can't be production. He was the best player on the team, production wise. One of the best PG prospects in the last 5 years. And was only 21 in his second year.

They Lakers gave up on him and sold low because they didn't like his personality :dame:
 

DGodRussell

peace and positivity
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
1,140
Reputation
39
Daps
4,570
Reppin
Based World
So are we sure we are taking Lonzo? Does our front office think he fits our culture?

There is a lot of leaks and smoke around him as well. Conditioning and effort in workouts, getting outplayed by Fox in the tourney, off-court distractions, etc.

We sure have heard a lot of raving feedback about Fultz, Jackson, Smith and Fox workouts. Nothing positive about Lonzo's....

Last week we tried to move up to take Fultz.

And last night we tried to move back...

:patrice:

Everyone close to the Lakers are saying there's still a good chance we take Lonzo but the fact that we haven't given him a guarantee and seeing shyt like this makes me think:jbhmm:
 
Top