Reid2Achieve
Superstar
I have. I wouldn’t say “way more” though. Nance has been solid. Randle has been been better (in a vacuum).AT THE END OF THE DAY, RANDLE IS WAY MORE OF AN OFFENSIVE THREAT THAN NANCE.....HAVE U BEEN WATCHIN HIM THIS YEAR??
I have. I wouldn’t say “way more” though. Nance has been solid. Randle has been been better (in a vacuum).AT THE END OF THE DAY, RANDLE IS WAY MORE OF AN OFFENSIVE THREAT THAN NANCE.....HAVE U BEEN WATCHIN HIM THIS YEAR??
I’m pushing back on the narrative that Nance is some bum tho. Randle is just simply not “way better” then him on offense. Randle is a better one on one player.Lonzo and Randle have great chemistry though and he even looked good with Brook out there. Larry Nance is a "safe" player, but Randle has more upside and is a better defender. Youre acting like Randle is some inefficient chucker, dude shooting 55% from the field. When Nance is in the starting lineup, the only players that create for themselves is Brandon Ingram and Lopez. Not alot of offensive firepower.
I take issue with that because he rarely goes one on one this year. When he does, he still struggles. Last night's game is why he's having his best season: the vast majority of his buckets are on the break or off pick and rolls.I’m pushing back on the narrative that Nance is some bum tho. Randle is just simply not “way better” then him on offense. Randle is a better one on one player.
I take issue with that because he rarely goes one on one this year. When he does, he still struggles. Last night's game is why he's having his best season: the vast majority of his buckets are on the break or off pick and rolls.
Even then, Nance is shooting 61% to Randle's 55% doing the same thing.
He's been assisted on 70% of his FGs this season, which is WAY up from the past two seasons (45 & 49%); Nance is at 74%. Like I keep saying, they do the same thing now, which is also why Randle is having a career year.THIS IS FLAT OUT WRONG
I never said Nance was a bum. Whether Randle is "way" better than Nance on offense is not even really the point. Im saying Randle is better than Nance period, offensively and defensively.I’m pushing back on the narrative that Nance is some bum tho. Randle is just simply not “way better” then him on offense. Randle is a better one on one player.
As for the starting lineup, I’ve wanted Kuzma to start since halfway through preseason.
Maybe. He's been awesome so far in his role. I'd hate to lose him for nothing or for simply a salary dump. But I also don't want to pay him next summer.I never said Nance was a bum. Whether Randle is "way" better than Nance on offense is not even really the point. Im saying Randle is better than Nance period, offensively and defensively.
He's been assisted on 70% of his FGs this season, which is WAY up from the past two seasons (45 & 49%); Nance is at 74%. Like I keep saying, they do the same thing now, which is also why Randle is having a career year.