You completely ignored what I said and posted your talking point. I think I've given you enough of my time. I'm putting you on ignore.I'm fine in perfectly thinking that masses of people, can be stupid.
You completely ignored what I said and posted your talking point. I think I've given you enough of my time. I'm putting you on ignore.I'm fine in perfectly thinking that masses of people, can be stupid.
does Kennedy have a chance?Pushback against liberal overreach. It is what it is. I'm not saying we're a red state now. Just saying more and more people are shying away from the blue state mentality that we've always had.
All you're doing is rambling about respecting majorities as being "correct"You completely ignored what I said and posted your talking point. I think I've given you enough of my time. I'm putting you on ignore.
All you're doing is rambling about respecting majorities as being "correct"
Thats the bullshyt populism I'm talking about.
Its not good for Trump's base and its not good when Bernie does it either.
So you're saying that the majority who voted for Clinton are "not correct" and "stupid".
You're missing the point.
Masses are not always "correct". You can respect the masses. You do NOT have an obligation to agree with them.
Thats the point.
If you wanna go by the electoral college, the "masses" were wrong there, too.
Elitism is whatever rubes like you are too stupid to understand.You're dodging the point.
It doesn't matter if they're correct or not. That's a point you conjured up to distract from the failure of party loyalty. Which oddly enough requires a mass of people to agree. Since we vote in a democratic republic, the masses will vote for whoever makes the better case.
That's the point. Hubris touted as elitism on who should be elected will fail. As it has for everyone you've supported.
If I wanna go by the electoral college, then that will be the second time a minority has circumvented the will of the majority.
Elitism is whatever rubes like you are too stupid to understand.
Hubris touted as elitism on who should be elected will fail.
do you think this is playing more favorably for her now?I actually agree that Ayanna has Presidential aspirations in the future. I’m from her state so I see what she’s doing close up. I’ll say this though — she has a TON of pushback locally against some of her policies, especially those involving cops. She might have a hard time in her next local election
They are def grooming her for a future run.
do you think this is playing more favorably for her now?