This is precisely my point.
You said, and I quote:
"This was a mild mannered accountant who found a gun in his pocket and fell went from balcony to balcony where he accidentally started firing at random people and the cops. There was no way he could have exhibited any signs or clues of this kind of behaviour prior to this bout with "bad luck"." [this is sarcasm for anyone following this exchange]
Now, this is only jarring to you because a gun was involved. If you subtract the gun from this situation, he's not going to be firing at random people and the cops is he? You're then wrong to assume that he would've been exhibiting signs/clues of this happening beforehand. Again, if there's no gun involved, you don't have the opinion that he would've exhibits these tendencies, to the same degree.
Just as if a man were to strangle his girlfriend to death, you would be more inclined to believe that he was a "mild mannered accountant", would you not?
Id say same thing. I don’t make the comment about guns but I say all the other shyt.
we all make mistakes. Some of us are able to learn from them while others are not so lucky. She was not lucky. But folk want to act like she didn’t make that mistake. She did and it’s ok. It’s just unfortunate that this useless act of shyt killed her.