Agreed
Article: I'm gay (pause) and I oppose same-sex marriage
- Thread starter valet
- Start date
Agreed
I dont believe the state should recognize same sex relationships, at all, but if they were backed into a corner and had to cosign their insanity what you said will work but also, they should be firewalled from any possible legal loophole they can use to get churchs to recognize their unions or marry them.
Some people would let the planet die to save their child. People are selfish and lose their reason when it concerns their children. How many parents would hide their mass murdering child? Many.
Brown_Pride
All Star
...you do know churches don't have to recognize a legal union, hell they can NOT recognize a boy/girl marriage right now if it's done in vegas or something.
But just for the record...
You don't want grown adults who choose to be with other grown adults to have the ability and equal protection of the law?
OUtside of religion what's your arugment against legal unions?
Sunalmighty
Superstar
That's how crafty Satan is. Read between the lines of that movement. And the infiltration taking place
SuikodenII
Where's Suikoden VI??????
Can atheists get married? 
Can atheists get married?
That's a good question. Somebody should make a thread posing that question to people that are against gay marriage...I'm legitimately curious as to their opinion on this. Should nonbelievers just have civil unions instead?
I think when the state recognizes the insanity that is homosexuality they are condoning behavior and allowing even more of it to spread among citizens. I feel it compounds issues we already have to deal with like, sexually transmitted diseases, sexual child abuse, etc. Most men agree that homosexuality is not something that should be encouraged in children but gay marriage tells children that its ok to be gay from a young age, which is wrong.
I feel that people who cosign homosexuality naturally have to cosign other brands of filth just to make everything fair and equal like transgendered marriages, incestuous marriages, etc which ultimately warp and perverse the natural order of men which is to squash these types of movements.
Gay marriage is an artificial, nurtured phenom that cannot occur without people in high places using their positions of power to slowly brainwash citizens into its acceptance. I feel that the push for homosexuality comes from people in positions of power being homosexual and too cowardly to come out of the closet because they know it will cost them votes so they use the insidious tactic of letting it breed among the population who in turn fight for the rights of this group so people in power can be more open with their sickness.
I feel that it is white culture to accept and embrace homosexuality and black people are victims of this perverse philosophy by living among them.
I feel that people who cosign homosexuality have a perverse view of family that ultimately hurts families because these same people will tell you that women can raise children by themselves. There is a lot of baggage that comes with same sex marriage that people overlook just so they can get gays in the door.
Lastly, i dont trust gay people and history has shown what they are capable of when their movements are slowly cosigned. They creep their way into each institution and basically change the entire landscape of morality to the detriment of the population for the benefit of a few.
I mean the bible says its ok. 
If those aren't religious arguments, then I've never seen one. It doesn't have to be explicitly religious in language- in fact, none of the legal arguments against it are, even though the people making them are all religious. Anything that tries to give some special status to marriage, against history, and against all the research, cannot be complaining from a place of reason.
Gay marriage can only thrive among single mothers and shytty fathers. It would be crazy if gay marriage, destroyed, gay people. Unless of course they are activly promoting that degeneracy among their artificial kids..
valet
The official Chaplain of the Coli
That's a good question. Somebody should make a thread posing that question to people that are against gay marriage...I'm legitimately curious as to their opinion on this. Should nonbelievers just have civil unions instead?
Please explain why this is a good question. I'm not following the logic.
porque
Boricua Guerrero
Problem is, many gay activists themselves don't want it that way. They INSIST on calling it "marriage" and putting it on par with traditional hetero marriage.