I'm talking about the one his lawyers tried to bury...
http://deadspin.com/here-are-the-documents-bill-cosby-didnt-want-you-to-rea-1716083975
"
MR. O’CONNOR: Keep it to the Jane Does. I’m not going beyond it. I’m instructing him not to answer it beyond the Jane Does.
(Tr. 9/29/05. 66-68)
BY MS. TROIANI:
Q. When you got the Quaaludes, was it in your mind that you were going to use these Quaaludes for young women that you wanted to have sex with?
A. Yes.
Q. Did you ever give any of those young women the Quaaludes without their knowledge?
MR. O’CONNOR: Object to the question. Restrict it to the Jane Does, would you, please"
"
Defendant testified that even though both Plaintiff and her mother told him that all they wanted was an apology, he called Plaintiff’s home and spoke to her mother to offer money for Plaintiff’s “education.” The following occurred during questioning about that event:"
"
Defendant admitted that in his initial conversation with Plaintiff and her mother, he asked them what they wanted and they said they only wanted an apology and to know the name of the drug Defendant had given to Plaintiff. He testified that some time after that call, he decided to call Plaintiffs mother to offer Plaintiff funds for “education” and to ask them to meet him in Florida. He then had a representative of the William Morris agency call Plaintiff. The William Morris agency also funneled money to one of the Rule 415 witnesses. It is believed that this line of questioning will lead to relevant information concerning other Jane Does, and other evidence which not only supports Plaintiffs version of the events, but also tends to prove the malicious actions of Defendant which evidence is relevant to punitive damages."
So you telling me that these women consented...
But in the deposition when asked outright if they did his lawyer objects to the question...then the woman and her daughter ask for an apology and to know what kind of drug it was...and then Bill jumps into paying for her "education" and there is no mention in the deposition that he actually did ever tell her what it was...
shyt is like a lifetime movie...
And I don't even see how it is possible to charge him with rape if any of the women consented to drug use...I thought the entire point of "drugged" was that they didn't know what they were taking...and i thought the point of the case is that he used drugs to rape women...not just raped women