Arrest Warrant Issued for Bill Cosby (UPDATE: Criminally Charged, Freed On $1M Bail)

[samtalksradio]

So let me get this straight; you can be a white cop, murdered a 12 year old kid on camera no indictment (on tape no less) but if you are black, in allegedly date rape some white cave bytches then that is grounds for indictment and incarceration (no evidence whatsoever)


I see what's going on here.

 

[AquaCityBoy]

Did everyone in here saying there's no evidence miss Cosby's own testimony?

That's the whole reason the charges were filed.

 

[Ashyneezz]

 

[Mr swag]

I'm about to make the post since I'm off work.

Everyone who thinks Bill Cosby is guilty let's make a roll call so y'all can't run after my post

 

[Poetical Poltergeist]

For all the people who claim this is a plot to destroy his legacy, may I ask "why now" when he's at his least relevant and if it's not true, why would he admit to drugging these women prior to sex?

For cacs it's better late than never. And him admitting to the drugging seals the deal in their eyes. And in many others.

 

[Neo. The Only. The One.]

sister on the left is #blackexcellence

 

[havoc]

Ya nikkaz ain't shyt

 

[The_King_of_Everything]

Y'all cracking jokes but I'm defending that nikka straight up.

Black man have it so bad on this planet and understand ain't nobody perfect but still....

Must of y'all talk all this black power shyt to sound "in" on the net and social media. That's the wave now that faux earthy energy charkra melonated mindset tumblr bullshyt but outside of that nikkas don't really care and it's sad.

nikkas need to do a better job of supporting one another and also holding each other accountable.

A lot nikkas is insecure and afraid to look in the mirror and there's others who choose to live in ignorance because that shyt is bliss.


Hopefully for 2016 we collectively learn to love ourselves and one another.

 

[rapbeats]

In so many words: yes.

A circus to defame his character and destroy his legacy.

Thats not all. pay attention. its a circus on the criminal side to setup the CIVIL SUITS. yall gotta pay attention. There was never a criminal case. so that made the burden of proof for any civil suits to heavy for any of the ladies to get bill on anything. which would mean they would lose a civil case.

but now that you have this. it makes it lighter, meaning the women have to prove a lot less. since just a mere criminal case(bs or not) can open you up for a Loss in a Civil Suit. Civil suits are not like criminal cases where its beyond a shadow of a doubt or reasonable doubt. which ever it is.

civl is = if its more likely true than not. then you win the case if you're going after someone.

that means if you feel the case is 60% true vs the 40% you dont. that 10 over the 50. breaks the tie and thats it. bill pays up.

in a criminal case. it cant be 60/40. thats not enough. it has to be some where around 85% chance or higher.

 

[William F. Russell]

Thats not all. pay attention. its a circus on the criminal side to setup the CIVIL SUITS. yall gotta pay attention. There was never a criminal case. so that made the burden of proof for any civil suits to heavy for any of the ladies to get bill on anything. which would mean they would lose a civil case.

but now that you have this. it makes it lighter, meaning the women have to prove a lot less. since just a mere criminal case(bs or not) can open you up for a Loss in a Civil Suit. Civil suits are not like criminal cases where its beyond a shadow of a doubt or reasonable doubt. which ever it is.

civl is = if its more likely true than not. then you win the case if you're going after someone.

that means if you feel the case is 60% true vs the 40% you dont. that 10 over the 50. breaks the tie and thats it. bill pays up.

in a criminal case. it cant be 60/40. thats not enough. it has to be some where around 85% chance or higher.

I agree but I did say that in another post in this thread where I responded to @pickles

 

[duckbutta]

So we just ignoring the part where Bill openly admitted to giving women quaaludes before having sex with them?

Is that in and of itself rape? Nope...but getting on the stand and admitting to purposely giving women a controlled substance while admitting the point of giving it to the women was to have sex isn't a smart thing to do...

Because Bill didn't say oh we just took some and ended up having sex...Bill didn't say well I gave it to some women and we didn't have sex at all...he said he gave it to women with the intent to have sex with them...

On the one hand it seems like white america trying to drag bill down...on the other hand it seems like Bill thought he could chastise black people while he had an admitted history of drugging up white women and having sex with them...I have a hard time garnering any sympathy for a black man who does that...because when you a black man and you starting mixing drugs and sex with white women...well then it is only a matter of time before someone says you raped them rather you did or not...

 

[loyola llothta]

Any lawyer/criminal justice brehs here?

Can someone explain to me how they are going to prove ol'boy raped these women from a decade ago?

So 100 women be like "He raped me" and that is enough?

No rape kits, no medical tests, no witnesses etc.

The jury pool is already tainted, I would think.

They dont need to its about ruining people perception of him and plus he counter sue some of the women ...they need to dirty up his name



At the end if the day is no proof is just "shes said"

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

So we just ignoring the part where Bill openly admitted to giving women quaaludes before having sex with them?

Are you ignoring the part where the women consented to taking the pills?

 

[duckbutta]

Are you ignoring the part where the women consented to taking the pills?

Post the part in his deposition where the women consented to taking anything he gave them...because he was directly asked that question...if the women consented...and his lawyer told him not to answer

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

Post the part in his deposition where the women consented to taking anything he gave them...because he was directly asked that question...if the women consented...and his lawyer told him not to answer

For this particular case, it's in the OP.

If there is any other depos, you need to quote the part where the women took something unknowingly, or against their will..