Are black people the only race who aren't afraid of white people?

[Samori Toure]

[QUOTE="jwonder, post: 22211453, member: 18919"]I would say black people are the only races that would go after whites, but it's a dwindling to a small portion. I've been seeing black people letting a lot of shyt slide lately. It's because we are not on the same level anymore. You really have black people that think there is no racism.[/QUOTE]

Are SandCacs a race for the purpose of this thread? Because they hate White people.

 

[Saiyajin]

There was plenty of white vs. black wars

British vs. Zulus
French vs. Haitians
Italians vs. Ethiopians
Romans vs. Egyptians
Romans vs. Carthage
Romans vs. Nubians
Whites vs. Seminoles (blacks and NAs)
Spanish (Catholics) vs. North Africans (Moors)

Blacks stood up to Europeans. Europeans just went through their Industrial Revolution a century before everyone else. They had superior technology. The Natives were sitting on valuable land that whites wanted and even though it was really the disease whites brought with them that killed the Natives, eventually they would have taken the Americas regardless if they had to bomb every last NA tribe out of existence Europeans didn't take Africa because for one, the climate is too hot for them to live in. For two, the diseases down there that Africans built a tolerance too would have killed them. For three, they felt more comfortable creating arbitrary nations to stake a claim on their portion of the rich minerals/resources in Africa instead of flat out eradicating the entire black race. But if they really wanted to, they could have done the same thing to Africans that they did to Native Americans. It was an unfair advantage. It would be like some country having alien technology right now while everyone else was using our human tech thinking it's advanced. Imagine North Korea with alien tech

99% of natives were killed by european diseases

and the Moors didnt stand up to the Europeans because they were the ones dominating and enslaving these cacs for 700 years. The europeans stood up to the Moors, and it took them 700 years to finally take back Spain by taking advantage of an ongoing civil war.
Moors had guns before these cacs too.


Technology doesnt mean shyt, look at the Vietnam war.

Disease beat the Natives, the Africans were defeated because they were preoccupied with civil wars and inner conflicts which the British took advantage of.
And British colonization was designed to seem like peaceful collaboration, the British took advantage of tribal conflicts and tensions to weaken the unity of the nation they colonzied. They always selected the rulers of their colonies from the inhabitants, British cacs had no authority or role in govering the colonies because they knew if the people caught even a whiff of it, there would be a very quick uprising


also If you think any European country or all of Europ combined would come close to succeeding in an open genocide against all Africans, you must be a moron or a cac.

 

[Insun Park]

[QUOTE="jwonder, post: 22211453, member: 18919"]I would say black people are the only races that would go after whites, but it's a dwindling to a small portion. I've been seeing black people letting a lot of shyt slide lately. It's because we are not on the same level anymore. You really have black people that think there is no racism.

Are SandCacs a race for the purpose of this thread? Because they hate White people.

[/QUOTE]
They don't hate white people. They hate western values and governments

If a white man converted to Islam, he would be treated like a gawd in the Middle East

 

[jwonder]

[QUOTE="jwonder, post: 22211453, member: 18919"]I would say black people are the only races that would go after whites, but it's a dwindling to a small portion. I've been seeing black people letting a lot of shyt slide lately. It's because we are not on the same level anymore. You really have black people that think there is no racism.

Are SandCacs a race for the purpose of this thread? Because they hate White people.

[/QUOTE]
Naw George W did that.

 

[Samori Toure]

99% of natives were killed by european diseases

and the Moors didnt stand up to the Europeans because they were the ones dominating and enslaving these cacs for 700 years. The europeans stood up to the Moors, and it took them 700 years to finally take back Spain by taking advantage of an ongoing civil war.

Technology doesnt mean shyt, look at Vietnam.

Disease beat the Natives, the Africans were defeated because they were preoccupied with civil wars and inner conflicts which the British took advantage of.
And British colonization was designed to seem like peaceful collaboration, the British took advantage of tribal conflicts and tensions to weaken the unity of the nation they colonzied. They always selected the rulers of their colonies from the inhabitants, British cacs had no authority or role in govering the colonies because they knew if the people caught even a whiff of it, there would be a very quick uprising


also If you think any European country or all of Europ combined would come close to succeeding in an open genocide against all Africans, you must be a moron or a cac.

It took the invention of the machine gun for the Europeans to colonize Africa. It was never a peaceful collaboration, because the Europeans whole aim was to subjugate the Africans. Who the Hell would peacefully be subjugated by foreign powers. So there were a lot of wars.

The Colonization of Africa

On a side note the seeds for colonization in West and Central Africa were actually sewn by the Africans themselves whose continued selling of slaves to the Europeans indirectly led to the Europeans industrial revolution. So the Africans screwed themselves and on top of that since they had engaged in the deportation of millions of African over a period of 400 years they didn't even have enough people left to help them to fight off of the advancing European armies. And to make matters a lot of tribes helped the Europeans in their conquest, because there was a lot of animosity between the tribes that stemmed from the slave trade and how certain tribes were targeted by others.

 

[Saiyajin]

It took the invention of the machine gun for the Europeans to colonize Africa. It was never a peaceful collaboration, because the Europeans whole aim was to subjugate the Africans. Who the Hell would peacefully be subjugated by foreign powers. So there were a lot of wars.

The Colonization of Africa

On a side note the seeds for colonization in West and Central Africa were actually sewn by the Africans themselves whose continued selling of slaves to the Europeans indirectly led to the Europeans industrial revolution. So the Africans screwed themselves and on top of that since they had engaged in the deportation of millions of African over a period of 400 years they didn't even have enough people left to help them to fight off of the advancing European armies. And to make matters a lot of tribes helped the Europeans in their conquest, because there was a lot of animosity between the tribes that stemmed from the slave trade and how certain tribes were targeted by others.

yea The machine gun is what allowed them to hold the territory otherwise they wouldve been driven out. But they also made sure to prevent resentment in the colonies towards themselves.

Example of this is clear in Rwanda, where the The Europeans used the Tutsi to rule and only allowed Tutsis to be educated and only allowed Tutsis to be a part of the government. Race is a completely modern concept, just because the people of Rwanada were all black doesnt mean they saw each other as a collective.

Khapoya considers the colonisers' administrative styles. "The French, the Portuguese, the Germans and the Belgians exercised a highly centralised type of administration called 'direct rule.'"[12] The British sought to rule by identifying local power holders and encouraging or forcing these to administer for the British Empire. This was indirect rule

 

[yardman]

Black people are afraid of the guns, tanks, nukes and missiles cacs have but we aren't afraid of cacs. We're just outgunned. Now if the playing field was even....

 

[Apollo Creed]

Worry about watered down "natives" brehs.

 

[Ms. Elaine]

black people aren't afraid of white people

I'm sayin'. I thought this thread was a joke.

Then I see some dumbasses actually cosigning.

 

[Ms. Elaine]

Black people are afraid of the guns, tanks, nukes and missiles cacs have but we aren't afraid of cacs. We're just outgunned. Now if the playing field was even....

Yes, many aren't afraid...just submissive.

 

[MR. SNIFLES]

ARABS

 

[Guile]

"was there any black vs white wars?"

nothing official but I can't believe this is even ask this question

Slave revolts here in the Americas, and full on wars in Africa, breh.

 

[Insun Park]

CACs and non blacks exposing themselves in this thread

 

[inthebushes]

Throw some numbers out there.

I'm just saying they've killed alot of white males in warfare. And if if you're really serious about destroying white supremacy it would eventually have to come to that. Although the pacific war was really only one that had some kind of anti white resolve behind it. They took what the west tought them and tried to beat them at their own game. Obviously what the Japanese did to other asians is reprehensible but it's hard not to admire what they accomplished.

 

[Ms. Elaine]

I guess all those c00ns I see on a daily basis are just a figment of my imagination.