mbewane
Knicks: 93 til infinity
I'm not dismissing raids, I'm saying that it wouldn't be Arabs doing the raids but other African Muslims. Also the map I posted is very accurate. Also how would Arabs get to Chad when they would have to get through Sudan? Sudan who already WHOOPED them twice in a war. Sudan/Nubians are one of the reasons why Arabs never expanded that far into Africa. But more importantly there was already powerful Sahelian states like the Kanen or Bornu controlling Chad. So slave raids in Chad in general would have not been allowed. African Muslim states did not allow foreign slave raids on their territory. Just ask the Portuguese when they tried to raid for slaves in Mali territory. Heck the Swahili's of coastal East Africa didn't even allow Arabs or other foreigners to migrate to Zimbabwe/Southern Africa because they did not want them to find the source of their minerals.
And the Arab slave trade is correlated with the Indian ocean trade. Its not focusing on one part of African when talking about the Arab slave trade. As for more proof, most African descent slaves in Middle Eastern states were of Bantu/Nilotic origins from southeast Africa and not other areas of Africa. Here's something that backs me up even more:
Africa from the Seventh to Eleventh Century, UNESCO, 1988
Hmm...thing is, in CAR "Arabs" also meant/means people from North Africa, which you may be calling "African Muslims", (which is the correct way to call them). So it may have been people from modern-day Lybia or from Northern Chad coming straight down, because those raids did happen and it was not Black Africans, if I were to believe those stories passed down. We might be talking of two different things
![yeshrug :yeshrug: :yeshrug:](https://www.thecoli.com/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/yeshrug.png)