Anyman who hits a woman with a closed fist/kicks her is the lowest of the low IMO

[WaveCapsByOscorp™]

well first off if you hit a man 160 lbs and you weigh 200 yeah to me that's a little much, i'm 190 ish and 150lb guy talking shyt to me amounts to a small dog barking, catching feelings on something like that is silly IMHO. Now if my life were on the line someones getting laid out, 150lb men tend not to confront bigger people though.

Second 150lb girl <> 150lb guy. Would you think yourself a man if you beat the ass of 115 lb man? That's what a rough conversion is on that maybe 120lb still, that's a highschool freshman at best.

Third, i hold the door open for anyone I happen to be in front of it's called manners. Do run into building and close the door or do you hold it open. Same thing, common courtesy. With a woman I do it because they are physically weaker than I am...but i'd also do it for the 120lb guy to simply because it's what I do. I've always looked out for the little guy though so maybe that's just me.

and this is still another problem with your reasoning, which is why i KNOW this is based on gender stereotypes. you're putting the idea of questioning my manhood simply because i fight someone. my manhood has nothing to do with prevailing stereotypes and assumed societal functions. it has everything to do with the fact that i was born with a dikk and all my other physical functions that are typical of any male.

bottom line, if they're an adult and they hit you, you have every right to defend yourself with the same level of hostility. how you choose to do it is a different matter entirely and dictates where your head is. but if the person who can clearly see that they're outmatched yet they assert physical force doesn't have enough reasoning to figure out that doing that is a bad idea, you're not responsible for their lack. i'm not promoting going all out on a person, but to pretend you can't punch them is stupid.

and your third reason, you're flip flopping between common social manners designed for everyone and chivalry, which is designed for male interactions with females. your two posts are conflicting. which can only mean, in my opinion, that you're moving away from your original idea that equality and chivalry can co-exist...

 

[Brown_Pride]

and this is still another problem with your reasoning, which is why i KNOW this is based on gender stereotypes. you're putting the idea of questioning my manhood simply because i fight someone. my manhood has nothing to do with prevailing stereotypes and assumed societal functions. it has everything to do with the fact that i was born with a dikk and all my other physical functions that are typical of any male.

bottom line, if they're an adult and they hit you, you have every right to defend yourself with the same level of hostility. how you choose to do it is a different matter entirely and dictates where your head is. but if the person who can clearly see that they're outmatched yet they assert physical force doesn't have enough reasoning to figure out that doing that is a bad idea, you're not responsible for their lack. i'm not promoting going all out on a person, but to pretend you can't punch them is stupid.

and your third reason, you're flip flopping between common social manners designed for everyone and chivalry, which is designed for male interactions with females. your two posts are conflicting. which can only mean, in my opinion, that you're moving away from your original idea that equality and chivalry can co-exist...

yeah maybe. I see what your'e saying on social manners vs chivalry. Ultimately i guess it's just a personal choice and personally i'd more or less think anyone who hit a woman is a biotch.

but if the person who can clearly see that they're outmatched yet they assert physical force doesn't have enough reasoning to figure out that doing that is a bad idea, you're not responsible for their lack

i'd ask if you'd hit a retarded person or show restraint?

 

[WaveCapsByOscorp™]

i'd ask if you'd hit a retarded person or show restraint?

being retarded is totally different. they have a mental handicap. are you saying being a female means you have some sort of mental handicap or it's comparable? because making that comparison in an attempt to refute my point is retarded in and of itself...

 

[Brown_Pride]

being retarded is totally different. they have a mental handicap. are you saying being a female means you have some sort of mental handicap or it's comparable? because making that comparison in an attempt to refute my point is retarded in and of itself...

not at all.
I'm not looking for an argument just asking questions. I wasn't trying to say women are handicap or even slide in a jab but you made the comment that someone who was 120lbs and stepping to you clearly didn't have the capacity to recognize they'd get fugged up. That being said where do you draw the line with mental capacity. I went retarded as an extreme. Where do you draw the line on when you don't do shyt but just react in a more controlled manner (be they man or woman.)

 

[WaveCapsByOscorp™]

not at all.
I'm not looking for an argument just asking questions. I wasn't trying to say women are handicap or even slide in a jab but you made the comment that someone who was 120lbs and stepping to you clearly didn't have the capacity to recognize they'd get fugged up. That being said where do you draw the line with mental capacity. I went retarded as an extreme. Where do you draw the line on when you don't do shyt but just react in a more controlled manner (be they man or woman.)

you're always suppose to act in a controlled manner. that's the idea of equality, that it balances out. i'm sure if you punched a woman once dead in her chest while she was swinging at you and acting the fool, that'd pacify her pretty damn quick and make her think twice. going around pretending that they have every reason to be emotionally unstable simply because they're females leaves them thinking they have a right to be that way, which they don't. that's not to say people don't have their moments, but you can't pretend that because they expressed themselves that way, they have a right to whenever they get mad, and we shouldn't do anything because we're physically stronger. obviously, they're not recognizing that fact if they're going to swing on you...

 

[Brown_Pride]

you're always suppose to act in a controlled manner. that's the idea of equality, that it balances out. i'm sure if you punched a woman once dead in her chest while she was swinging at you and acting the fool, that'd pacify her pretty damn quick and make her think twice. going around pretending that they have every reason to be emotionally unstable simply because they're females leaves them thinking they have a right to be that way, which they don't. that's not to say people don't have their moments, but you can't pretend that because they expressed themselves that way, they have a right to whenever they get mad, and we shouldn't do anything because we're physically stronger. obviously, they're not recognizing that fact if they're going to swing on you...

To each his own i suppose. As i said personally I wouldn't nor have I. I don't personally think men and women maintain the same emotional makeup so we react differently, nor do i pretend that the societal assumed norms of chivalry haven't affected most women to assume certain things like a man shouldn't hit a woman.

 

[TLOL is back]

But hitting men is not as bad? I wonder how many people who think women should be treated equally support this double standard.

 

[Pool_Shark]

Thread made a right on it's way to JBO

 

[Amare's Right Hook]

sHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIT

 

[88m3]

Oh wow...



wow

 

[jadillac]

lets get some scenarios for proper perspective

yeah, I hate this, "you should never hit a woman under any circumstances" bs.

As a human, male or female, you have a right BY LAW mind you, to defend yourself. You can call the cops on a female spouse who beats you as rightfully as she can do the same if you beat her.

Let's break this down:

Physically unprovoked: A woman slaps you/pushes you/hits you one time with her fist = you walk away/yell at her/at most grab her arms or shove her away from you so you can leave

Physically unprovoked: A woman continues violently hitting you repeatedly after you tell her to stop/she comes at you with a foreign object or a weapon/anything beyond that = you knock the piss outta her

Y'all act like if youre in some rough part of town and a female thug tries to rob you/jump you like you're just gonna be kind and polite and think about how you should never hit a woman. You better knock her ass out b/c, a. you dont know if she has a gun/knife b. She's robbing you attempting to do you bodily harm.

 

[88m3]

Are we really doing this?





Shout out to Tom

 

[Brown_Pride]

Are we really doing this?





Shout out to Tom

i guess hitting chicks is what's hot in the street these days...

 

[Mowgli]

Hitting women with closed fists is an act for people who dont know brazillian jiujitsu.

 

[Brown_Pride]

Hitting women with closed fists is an act for people who dont know brazillian jiujitsu.

lol i guess getting your girl in an arm bar is the way to go.