Anthony Davis has requested a trade from N.O. Update: AD to Lakers for Lonzo, Ingram, Hart & 3 picks

Ribbs

Veteran
Joined
May 25, 2015
Messages
21,421
Reputation
3,691
Daps
86,570
Reppin
Toronto
Brooklyn eh :patrice:

And Kyrie had them as a landing spot aside from the Lakrs :patrice:

Depending on if DLo plans on sticking around, this might be a squad to fear in the East :patrice:
 

lib123

All Star
Joined
Jun 16, 2015
Messages
6,027
Reputation
334
Daps
12,105
Ingram + Lonzo + picks or

3rd + Knox + Robinson + DSJ + Dallas picks or

Tatum + Brown + Smart + picks

+ Zion means we win no matter what

#PelsGang #Cacawwww

:blessed:

Ingram + Lonzo + #4 Pick + Cap Filler is fair
 

tremonthustler1

aka bx_representer
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
82,702
Reputation
8,845
Daps
204,490
Reppin
My Pops Forever RIP
I’m a Knick fan and I don’t see how a Knick package is better then that
Easy.


Lonzo supposedly doesn’t even wanna be there, so your best bet is hoping the Bulls miss out on all the PG’s (but if NO takes a F, one of Garland /White will fall to Chicago). For that you might as well bring back Payton.

The biggest thing is that Ingram is up for an extension and even if he was healthy he might not be worth what he will want to command. You only get a year to find out. Kuzma has the least red flags yet he’d be Zion’s backup at the 4.

The Knick offer gives the Pelicans in theory the perfect defensive pairing in Mitchell Robinson for Zion, another pick to get Barrett (I’m not a fan of Barrett or this draft but if they believe in pairing them together this is the way to do that, and you get future picks. Whatever they throw in as extra is just that (and that includes Knox)

The Clippers might have a better offer than the Lakers because they can take on a Solomon Hill and offer a bunch of prospects including Harrell.
 

drifter

Superstar
Joined
Dec 15, 2013
Messages
5,917
Reputation
2,943
Daps
22,080
Easy.


Lonzo supposedly doesn’t even wanna be there, so your best bet is hoping the Bulls miss out on all the PG’s (but if NO takes a F, one of Garland /White will fall to Chicago). For that you might as well bring back Payton.

The biggest thing is that Ingram is up for an extension and even if he was healthy he might not be worth what he will want to command. You only get a year to find out. Kuzma has the least red flags yet he’d be Zion’s backup at the 4.

The Knick offer gives the Pelicans in theory the perfect defensive pairing in Mitchell Robinson for Zion, another pick to get Barrett (I’m not a fan of Barrett or this draft but if they believe in pairing them together this is the way to do that, and you get future picks. Whatever they throw in as extra is just that (and that includes Knox)

The Clippers might have a better offer than the Lakers because they can take on a Solomon Hill and offer a bunch of prospects including Harrell.

Nah. If we can use the rumors of Lonzo not wanting to play there then we can also use the rumors of the Knicks not including Robinson in trade talks, what does NY's offer look like then? And who cares if Lonzo don't want to go there, draft Garland with the 4th and trade him to the Suns or Bulls who have both been linked to him and LA.

That's two lottery picks along with Ingram and Kuzma, by far the best deal from the teams on his trade list. Nets unfortunately don't enough. Robinson is the key, Knicks don't have enough either without him included.
 

tremonthustler1

aka bx_representer
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
82,702
Reputation
8,845
Daps
204,490
Reppin
My Pops Forever RIP
Nah. If we can use the rumors of Lonzo not wanting to play there then we can also use the rumors of the Knicks not including Robinson in trade talks, what does NY's offer look like then? And who cares if Lonzo don't want to go there, draft Garland with the 4th and trade him to the Suns or Bulls who have both been linked to him and LA.

That's two lottery picks along with Ingram and Kuzma, by far the best deal from the teams on his trade list. Nets unfortunately don't enough. Robinson is the key, Knicks don't have enough either without him included.
There’s a difference between a team hesitant to offer a player vs. a player you can get but will be a pain in the ass (due to Lavar, Lonzo would be a pain in the ass even if he was good)

You’re presuming Lonzo commands lottery pick value (and I’m LA and he did, you make that trade regardless of whether you land Davis or not.)
 
Top