YoungMoneyCashMoneyBoy
Superstar
I think this is the game he's talking about.
52 pts (21-30 FG) 6 ast 4 stl (12-12 FTs)
Those stats aren't adding up. At a minimum, that would be 54 points.
I think this is the game he's talking about.
52 pts (21-30 FG) 6 ast 4 stl (12-12 FTs)
Those stats aren't adding up. At a minimum, that would be 54 points.
bu bu bu the defense in today's league tho
we got nikkas shooting 9-30 and 24-24 FTs winning MVPS![]()
It's probably this game only because he said it was towards the end of the season when the bulls were on fire in 92 or 93 and they won by 24. The game you had was in December and they won by 11.My bad, it was 20-31 I edited my post, thanks for the heads up.
I think this is the game he's talking about.
52 pts (20-31 FG) 6 ast 4 stl (12-12 FTs)
Bulls only won that game by 11. Think this story is exaggerated at best.
What sounds exaggerated? And what does this guy gain from exaggerating this 27 year old story?Bulls only won that game by 11. Think this story is exaggerated at best.
Yeah theres a game in 92 where he scored 44 and they won by 24 that could be itIt might not be the right game. He could be talking about a different one.
It's probably this game only because he said it was towards the end of the season when the bulls were on fire in 92 or 93 and they won by 24. The game you had was in December and they won by 11.
To make a good story like everyone else does when they tell stories about their idolsWhat sounds exaggerated? And what does this guy gain from exaggerating this 27 year old story?
So, again, what parts are exaggerated to make this a good story?To make a good story like everyone else does when they tell stories about their idols
It has to be the '92 game because Roenick was 18 in '88.
I Could definitely see it....Imagine mj betting with some underaged kid