Angry Democratic Donors Turn Off The Flow Of Money - “I’ll be blunt here: The Democratic Party is f‑‑‑ing terrible

L@CaT

For Hire Gunslinger!
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
15,888
Reputation
-679
Daps
27,768
Do you think a woman or black person could win?

I feel like ant Dem that isn’t a straight white guy will be seen that way no matter what they do.
It's hard to say. I think an Oprah type could potentially win but she would really have to play the game and support certain right wing ideas like Lower Taxes and strict Immigration. Basically some of Trumps talking points but with class.
 

the cac mamba

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
103,501
Reputation
13,823
Daps
301,645
Reppin
NULL
You purposely enjoy the Dem party being this weak. And want to stick to a formula that clearly doesn't work.
honestly, 2024 was more of an anomaly than any kind of "formula"

-post-pandemic, worldwide inflation
-biden totally fukked the party by seeking a second term at 82, which was a disgrace
-kamala is one of the worst politicians i've ever seen, and was installed, not elected by a primary base

we're never gonna see those circumstances align ever again :dead: 2026 and 2028 is a clean slate
 

Uachet

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 25, 2022
Messages
6,067
Reputation
4,789
Daps
35,422
Reppin
Black Self-Sufficiency
It's up to the states to decide. Way less than 1% are competing in college level sports much less grade school.


Your obsession with them makes me think you are fighting urges :patrice:
I will point out the flaw in your argument. See, if there is only 1% who are trying to do it, then why are the Democrats so willing to lose elections over pushing their support for them? If the issue should be considered unimportant, than why is it so important to the Democratic establishment?

The same argument you use to shut people up from focusing on the issue and asking the Democrats to stop pushing it, is the same argument that can be used against the Democrats that seem so focused on defending the mentally ill males' desire to compete with females. The arguments works on both ends of the spectrum.

If they are too few in number to worry about for the naysayers, then they should also be too few in number to push forward as a major concern by the Democratic Party. Especially when the Democrats need to stop being seen as the party of abject deviancy.
 

2 Up 2 Down

Veteran
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
29,088
Reputation
3,030
Daps
70,712
Reppin
NULL
I will point out the flaw in your argument. See, if there is only 1% who are trying to do it, then why are the Democrats so willing to lose elections over pushing their support for them? If the issue should be considered unimportant, than why is it so important to the Democratic establishment?

The same argument you use to shut people up from focusing on the issue and asking the Democrats to stop pushing it, is the same argument that can be used against the Democrats that seem so focused on defending the mentally ill males' desire to compete with females. The arguments works on both ends of the spectrum.

If they are too few in number to worry about for the naysayers, then they should also be too few in number to push forward as a major concern by the Democratic Party. Especially when the Democrats need to stop being seen as the party of abject deviancy.
Democrats play identity politics. They do so to not focus of economics because the only logical way to turn is to side with progressives.

But I will point out that they haven't been doing a big trans focus outside of saying a few things. Republicans have been the ones that constantly brought up trans people
 
Top