Amy Coney Barrett CONFIRMED to the U.S. Supreme Court

Who will it be?

  • Amy Coney Barrett: A 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals judge since 2017, a Trump appointee.

    Votes: 33 82.5%
  • Barbara Lagoa: An 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals judge since December 2019, a Trump appointee.

    Votes: 2 5.0%
  • Allison Jones Rushing: A Fourth Circuit U. S. Court of Appeals judge since 2018, a Trump appointee.

    Votes: 1 2.5%
  • Someone else

    Votes: 4 10.0%

  • Total voters
    40

wire28

Blade said what up
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
52,821
Reputation
12,428
Daps
195,473
Reppin
#ByrdGang #TheColi
this is what rose twitter and the far left wanted


:manny:


props to whoever is watching this, couldn't be me

:mjlol: the most backward ass smart dumb nikkas really emerged the last few years. They really thought making things as worse as possible would be better :dead: good luck pushing the change you want with a 6-3 court :dead:
 

The Fukin Prophecy

RIP Champ
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
24,412
Reputation
5,706
Daps
95,934
A 6-5, conservative court...
That's fine by me...

There is a valid case for 11 in retaliation to Moscow Mitch and Rethugs hypocritical power grab...

There is no justification for 13 though other than a power grab and when Dems lose power again, Rethugs will have legitimate reason to retaliate...

We could end up with more SCOTUS judges than Senators if we go that route...
 

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
45,070
Reputation
2,469
Daps
133,115
That's fine by me...

There is a valid case for 11 in retaliation to Moscow Mitch and Rethugs hypocritical power grab...

There is no justification for 13 though other than a power grab and when Dems lose power again, Rethugs will have legitimate reason to retaliate...

We could end up with more SCOTUS judges than Senators if we go that route...
Yeah I'm fine with 6-5 , they stole two justices with conflicting reasonings; if they think about doing it again you expand further down the line.
 

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
50,945
Reputation
4,421
Daps
89,027
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
Any number of justices is sufficient IMO, which is an argument *against* court packing because gaining an ideological majority for your side is literally the only thing it can accomplish...
 

the cac mamba

Veteran
Bushed
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
102,485
Reputation
13,656
Daps
299,363
Reppin
NULL
That's fine by me...

There is a valid case for 11 in retaliation to Moscow Mitch and Rethugs hypocritical power grab...

There is no justification for 13 though other than a power grab and when Dems lose power again, Rethugs will have legitimate reason to retaliate...

We could end up with more SCOTUS judges than Senators if we go that route...
yep, hoping the same

dems should just add two, and say things like "this is a direct response to mcconnell's abuse of power, the conservatives will still maintain their majority but 6-5 represents america better", etc

because adding 2 young judges plus breyer's replacement is enough
 

the cac mamba

Veteran
Bushed
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
102,485
Reputation
13,656
Daps
299,363
Reppin
NULL
Yeah I'm fine with 6-5 , they stole two justices with conflicting reasonings; if they think about doing it again you expand further down the line.
nah, they only stole one. if obama had the right to appoint in 2016, then trump has the right to appoint right now

so it SHOULD be 5-4. 6-3 is unacceptable
 

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
45,070
Reputation
2,469
Daps
133,115
Any number of justices is sufficient IMO, which is an argument *against* court packing because gaining an ideological majority for your side is literally the only thing it can accomplish...
It must be nice to sit on the outside of the reality of current politics and play obtuse like the courts arent being utilized for political advantages. In fact , currently we're in the process of rushing a judicial nominee thru the senate ...based on an hopeful ideological advantage which has accelerated the last 8 years.
 

Th3G3ntleman

Superstar
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
14,639
Reputation
-2,757
Daps
53,640
Reppin
NULL
As far as I'm concerned the more court packing the quicker the credibility of the supreme court goes up in flames and it get's exposed for being essentially an extension of the senate. Maybe with this people will realize just how shyt the supreme court has been and it can finally get evaporated. They have had too much of an impact on American life for a group of unelected officials. Fucck them.
 

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
50,945
Reputation
4,421
Daps
89,027
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
It must be nice to sit on the outside of the reality of current politics and play obtuse like the courts arent being utilized for political advantages. In fact , currently we're in the process of rushing a judicial nominee thru the senate ...based on an hopeful ideological advantage which has accelerated the last 8 years.
:mjlol:
Give me some examples of SC rulings under Trump that justify this level of panic and judicial reform.
It must be nice to sit on the outside of reality and pretend our conservative SC hasnt thwarted every bit of Trumps idiocy that made it in front of them.



There needs to be more separation IMO with congress losing its ability to play these games with the judiciary. The SC is fine as is.
 
Last edited:
Top