this is what rose twitter and the far left wanted
props to whoever is watching this, couldn't be me
That's fine by me...A 6-5, conservative court...
Yeah I'm fine with 6-5 , they stole two justices with conflicting reasonings; if they think about doing it again you expand further down the line.That's fine by me...
There is a valid case for 11 in retaliation to Moscow Mitch and Rethugs hypocritical power grab...
There is no justification for 13 though other than a power grab and when Dems lose power again, Rethugs will have legitimate reason to retaliate...
We could end up with more SCOTUS judges than Senators if we go that route...
yep, hoping the sameThat's fine by me...
There is a valid case for 11 in retaliation to Moscow Mitch and Rethugs hypocritical power grab...
There is no justification for 13 though other than a power grab and when Dems lose power again, Rethugs will have legitimate reason to retaliate...
We could end up with more SCOTUS judges than Senators if we go that route...
nah, they only stole one. if obama had the right to appoint in 2016, then trump has the right to appoint right nowYeah I'm fine with 6-5 , they stole two justices with conflicting reasonings; if they think about doing it again you expand further down the line.
It must be nice to sit on the outside of the reality of current politics and play obtuse like the courts arent being utilized for political advantages. In fact , currently we're in the process of rushing a judicial nominee thru the senate ...based on an hopeful ideological advantage which has accelerated the last 8 years.Any number of justices is sufficient IMO, which is an argument *against* court packing because gaining an ideological majority for your side is literally the only thing it can accomplish...
It must be nice to sit on the outside of the reality of current politics and play obtuse like the courts arent being utilized for political advantages. In fact , currently we're in the process of rushing a judicial nominee thru the senate ...based on an hopeful ideological advantage which has accelerated the last 8 years.
Here you go one from today in fact, trumps fight to rig the apportionment of house seats
Give me some examples of SC rulings under Trump that justify this level of panic and judicial reform.
Yeah I think just adding two more judges will work just fineHere you go one from today in fact, trumps fight to rig the apportionment of house seats
Supreme Court sides with Trump administration bid to end 2020 census count
A 7-1 decision?Here you go one from today in fact, trumps fight to rig the apportionment of house seats
Supreme Court sides with Trump administration bid to end 2020 census count