They're going to keep deliberating tomorrow. Who knows how long it takes for them to come up with a verdict. Hopefully they're done tomorrow, b/c if it goes past tomorrow that means someone is being stubborn.
Amber Guyger Found Guilty of Murder!!!..... 10 years
- Thread starter Standing on business
- Start date
uh oh.
"Stand Your Ground" law. Yeah, she gettin off. At worst a mistrial.
She'll have 100K donations in a GoFundMe by next week. smh
ARE U SERIOUS???uh oh.
"Stand Your Ground" law. Yeah, she gettin off. At worst a mistrial.
She'll have 100K donations in a GoFundMe by next week. smh
WTF, SO YOU MEAN TO TELL ME THIS BYTCH CAN GET OFF FROM MURDERING A MAN IN HIS HOME, THAT SHE "THOUGHT"(IT'S BEEN SAID THAT SHE BANGED ON HIS DOOR) WAS HERS???
So she can be convicted of EITHER Manslaughter or Murder
This was clearly Murder
For jurors to find Guyger, 31, guilty of murder, the state must have proved that she "intentionally or knowingly" caused the death of Jean.
She did this when she CONSCIOUSLY chose not to render aid or perform CPR on Jean as he lay bleeding to death AFTER she realized her “mistake”. She shot that young man, and then allowed him to die. She is the DEFINITION of a murderer
This was clearly Murder
For jurors to find Guyger, 31, guilty of murder, the state must have proved that she "intentionally or knowingly" caused the death of Jean.
She did this when she CONSCIOUSLY chose not to render aid or perform CPR on Jean as he lay bleeding to death AFTER she realized her “mistake”. She shot that young man, and then allowed him to die. She is the DEFINITION of a murderer
Breh calm down.. Have you been watching the trial?uh oh.
"Stand Your Ground" law. Yeah, she gettin off. At worst a mistrial.
She'll have 100K donations in a GoFundMe by next week. smh
Yeah the judge allowed the jury to hear the Castle doctrine as a defense for guyer but that was ripped to shreds by the prosecution by every point because he poised no threat, she said he came after her which is BS because you can see where his body dropped.
I even asked my brother for clarification and of couple of other my brehs on the force within last hour, this case does NOT fit the castle doctrine because SHE ENTERED his home, not the other way around and she ignored every sign it wasn't hers. Even if any juror believes her version, that's reckless on her behalf and should atleast warrant a manslaughter charge. The problem is convincing that one or two juror who may disagree with that.
I been a jury on a murder/robbery trial. You pick a foreman, and vote on the highest charge.. They deliberated for almost four hrs today, so either way after a few votes they are not unanimous which can be taken either way... It only takes one to hold out..
loyola llothta
☭☭☭
I asked my breh in law school regarding the castle doctrine and this was his take.
Because one of the things that get successfully get you a new trial on appeal is if the judge erroneously denies instructing the jury on a relevant issue that
By allowing the jury instruction here the judge is covering a base that she could appeal on if she is found guilty
And if the jury is gonna find her not guilty they probably would have done it with or without considering castle doctrine because castle doctrine is kind of a secondary argument to the main mistake of fact self defense argument anyway
By allowing the jury instruction here the judge is covering a base that she could appeal on if she is found guilty
And if the jury is gonna find her not guilty they probably would have done it with or without considering castle doctrine because castle doctrine is kind of a secondary argument to the main mistake of fact self defense argument anyway
Exactly, she aimed her gun and shot to kill
Are we talking possible grounds for an appeal
She was not in her apt. So none of this applies to her
Last edited:
Disgusting, these mothafukkas never do anything wrong
and when they do get convected their punishment never fits the crime.