Amanda Bynes or Lindsay Lohan which fall off was worse?

Norrin Radd

To me, my board!
Joined
Jun 9, 2013
Messages
47,889
Reputation
9,860
Daps
220,154
Reppin
Zenn-La
tumblr_nq9ncuH7Uh1uv4jw6o8_1280.jpg
:whoo: Damn I forgot how fine she used to be
giphy.gif

:whew:
 

winb83

52 Years Young
Supporter
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
45,104
Reputation
3,748
Daps
68,343
Reppin
Michigan
Imma go with Amanda if only cause Lindsay's actually recovering. Haven't heard anything about Amanda
She just had a piece done about her. She got off drugs and is interested in un-retiring.
Break the Internet: Amanda Bynes
It's crazy how she said watching herself in Easy A while on drugs drove her nuts and convinced her to quit acting altogether.
 

White City Black

Ol’ Basquiat head ass
Joined
Aug 4, 2017
Messages
5,915
Reputation
1,273
Daps
18,823
Reppin
Chicago's South Shore
She just had a piece done about her. She got off drugs and is interested in un-retiring.
Break the Internet: Amanda Bynes
It's crazy how she said watching herself in Easy A while on drugs drove her nuts and convinced her to quit acting altogether.

I just read that article, came across a free copy of this magazine at a record shop. Funny thing is...Lohan also has an article in the same issue.

And yes, definitely Lindsay had the worst fall off because she was supposed to be one of the biggest stars in Hollywood by now.
 

Poetical Poltergeist

Precise and cold hearted
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
36,276
Reputation
5,316
Daps
117,046
Reppin
Mile in the Sky
I don't think the fall-off of Lohan has been covered extensively yet.

Her 30 for 30 wouldn't be 5 parts like OJ, but there's at least 3 - the rise, the peak/fall-off, then the nut-job she is now.
Nah the bytch ain't important enough for that much detail. You can do her life story in 30 mins.
 

Able Archer 83

Two Minutes to Midnight
Joined
Nov 12, 2015
Messages
947
Reputation
380
Daps
3,584
Reppin
316
LiLo had the push lined up. If she kept her head straight, she could have picked her future--Oscars, Emmys, anything. But since she was a feckless mess, they replaced her with Emma Stone--just as attractive, just as talented, yet far more professional and reliable.

Hollywood uses up women and throws them away like trash. The wholesale replacement of LiLo in record time shows just how disposable she really was.
 

ELESDEE616

Nikkas snitch on the coli like they name is Kobe
Supporter
Joined
Mar 3, 2017
Messages
5,150
Reputation
-115
Daps
19,607
Reppin
Kobe snitched on Shaq
LiLo had the push lined up. If she kept her head straight, she could have picked her future--Oscars, Emmys, anything. But since she was a feckless mess, they replaced her with Emma Stone--just as attractive, just as talented, yet far more professional and reliable.

Hollywood uses up women and throws them away like trash. The wholesale replacement of LiLo in record time shows just how disposable she really was.
Emma Stone doesn't have near the sex appeal and charisma of a prime Lohan. If you 27-32:flabbynsick: you were hitting puberty when Mean Girls came out and lemme tell you she was a legit 10 after that movie came out. So better looking than Emma Stone with the same acting ability

Smut culture took off at that point and she got caught up in it. If not she would've been the next Meryl Streep.

I remember watching Georgia Rule just because she was in it and she played a sex abuse victim who turns into a smut because it. The acting was a little too realistic :mjcry:
 

ColdSlither

Extensive Enterprises
Supporter
Joined
Aug 29, 2018
Messages
7,335
Reputation
1,123
Daps
27,052
Reppin
Elizabeth, NJ by way of East Orange
Lohan all the way. Amanda Bynes's fall off was tragic, but she was never going to be A+/A- list. Lindsay would have been permanent A status. She's only 32 now. She would be transitioning into older roles now. Then there was her natural beauty. The girl looked good. Even without makeup she was still pretty. She had to go and screw that up though. Yes, there was the general fukkery of her lifestyle. She could have come back from that though. She probably would have had to do a few extra orgies and gangbangs on a few yachts for some obscenely rich old men we've never heard of, which would have just broken her more than she already was. I mean, we know how satanic Hollywood is. But she still could have come back. She had to go and fukk up the face though
 

Able Archer 83

Two Minutes to Midnight
Joined
Nov 12, 2015
Messages
947
Reputation
380
Daps
3,584
Reppin
316
Emma Stone doesn't have near the sex appeal and charisma of a prime Lohan.

"The light that burns twice as bright burns half as long"--Eldon Tyrell

I would disagree with the charisma part, and say the sex appeal is ultimately irrelevant. She was much hotter than Stone, but she didn't have the looks to go the distance. Her beauty is the most fragile kind; once it goes--whether due to age or drug/alcohol abuse--that's it. You're destined for bad television or Lifetime/Hallmark movies or an escort career or as a concubine to an elderly plutocrat. Stone, like Streep, has that middling kind of beauty, the one that's more easily disguised and thus more versatile on screen, the kind of beauty built for the long haul.

Lohan is fukked in the head, most likely due to her childhood, greatly exacerbated by chemical dependancy. Her indulgence in "smut culture" i.e. her voyeurism is a symptom rather than the cause.
 
Top